Papamma W/O. Venkatarayappa vs Venkatarathnam on 9 July, 2008

:14. $§€I.i§{$i§A'f}¥§§IA%$§V!;§.MY,
 "- AGED ».:3__ YEARS '

 {A?3?E.LLANT No'.4H:1s MINOR,

  R.E.13R}:§sE.m"EJ:) BY HIS MOTHER AND

 '.NATURFxL {}_UAR£)IAN SM'T.B¥ARASAMMA
-  'A.;PPE:LLAI'~:'rs 2 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT

 "'::RANGUDLU CHELUR,
' V VBAGLEPAELI TALUK.

 ' '' ~  « .  V' SM'I'.SUBBAMMA,

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE
BEFORE THE LOX ADALAT V. 

Re THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BfiNQ$'£[§;3§:E:.,

DATED 'm:Is mm 091% my or JIILY 29 :O8'«;  "    *

CONCILIATORS PRE;sm~e'T-fl 

EIOWBLE 1\m.JU'S'I'ICE N..K't'3MAR   A =
SRI.N.S.SAlifl'A'fi'GI RA]!  *.=xH, 
Miscellaneous FiI$f1':~..4fA._fl5A¢nIAH'Q3_§__2;_4-2 [ 2004
Lo]; Adalsgt ~i4io.*?6%1{2'ߤ"38" 
BETWEEN:   i   

2. 8MT.PAPA19IMA,Wi'Q.VENKATARAYAPFfi.,_ 
AGED 70YEAR;_:;,'--._  .1    
RESIDINGK1' ::;o_;LAKS:»1'mAM1¢La;' V.  
CHILAKALANERU'PU;_..  ~ « " 
<:HmTAM:m'i'TA:UK.'   

SMT.NAR£i'sAP.¢M;A,: v§?;k'c§;L».§?I'i~.t::'§%:;é.1~iN FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT
 03, Vc:Q.tg;:,t?1:;1v2;~g,5.T10N

'  A§?rE;R'BEn:qG REFERRED VIBE ORDER DATED 20-3-2003, THE §-'OLLOWEJG
  . V '0R:>Er-3 ES--PASSED.

Ix.)

6. CHIRANJIVI RAMANJANEYA,
S] CLLATE SANGAPPA,
AGE{) 1 I YEARS.

*2. KUMARI RAMADEW,
D] ().LA'I'E ssamesxppa,
AGEB *2' YEARS.
(APPELLAMS 6 & 7 ARE MINORS, _ I  A. 
REPRESENTED BY THEIR MOTHER AND 
NATURAL GUARDIAN   " A. "
SMT.SUBBAMMA. W 5TH APPELLA£r?1'."~~

APPELLANT No.5 TO 7 ARE REs:1-miig. 
AT CHILAKALANERPU   .    
CHINTAMANITALUK. U' 'A 'L 2   _ A.PPELL.&N'I'$
(BY sR;.Y.R,:s.a,nA$firvA;'jm:n:.\¥, gmifécnrmg

L  I  
MAJOR,   
BAGEPALILI THLH  '];)'iSTRICT.

2. THE ORIEETTAE, INSURANCE £19..-LTD.,
C.B.C> M :0, NO.:2()0}"3, '1.=%"1" FI;C1C¥R,
mxsx:-mi TOWERS, .I§IEA;t??._ BANGALORE
HOSPIIEAL, %.R.v.R0A_r), BANGALORE ---- 4.
 " mL:cfy' <N<;1.,:20;:)2~ 1269; 1111 M * .. RESPOKDENTS

 '   ADVOCATE FOR R2;
MFA' .Fi;ED  éj7$3(13 0? MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND

CIVIL JUDGE &..SI-11.DN. 85 JMFC, AMACT, CHINTAMANI, PARTLY ALLOWING

'i'§i1'E§v,i3;P'I5'EAL COBEENG ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT

h/



D.)

COHCILIATION ORDER
This is a claimants' appeal seeking enliaiiaerneiit of
compensation for the death of {I16 bread Ciarliifil' ofinia

motor vehicle accident.   

The claimant was agiad about 43._yea1's:.'   ii

aged mother, wife, son and childreii;  
as his earning per day. It is   accident is of
the: year 2002. He was    and therefere the
minimum earning slfi-Qiiigl' 00 per day. Only
a sum of Rs.3,0()(},:""--  Rs.5,000/ ~ towards
loss of cons9.rti11_Iii ;;,.._ti.iw'ards £033 of estate are
awarded  aiff:  faking inte consideration of the
aforesaid deficienicyi,  negotiations, the parties have
 Qlainiant__.isv entitled to a glabal compensation of

Rs.fiV;3(LlflOQ[  Two Lakh Thirty Thousand only) in addition

 aiaarded by the 'Tribunal. Hence, we pass the

_ _ft:_--1lr:;4Wiing arderia;

   ,  appeal is allowed in part.

i.  In addition to the Conipensation awarded by the

Tribunal, the claimants -- appellants are entitled to a



sum of }?s.2_,.30,000/-- (Rupees Two Lakh Thirty
'I'ho1.1sa11d only) as global compensation. "

C} The Respondent --~ I11sura1i3.ce Company shfill' 

said amount within 6 weeksfroxiz thé'(i’s;i§;,o’f.re::ei;§tf ‘of

copy of this order, failing wf:ioh’_i}’:{e ”

carry interest at the réitoof 9% :;>.a_.

default til} the date; of dop.o$’it, _

1

%5dIs..

A ‘Judge

‘ M . —