High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Pappu Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 31 August, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Pappu Singh vs The State Of Bihar on 31 August, 2010
           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                      Cr.Misc. No.22529 of 2010
      PAPPU SINGH, S/o Dhukh Bhanjan Singh @ Ram Bhanjan Singh.
                                Versus
                         THE STATE OF BIHAR
                               -----------

03. 31.08.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for

the offences under Sections 302, 201 and 379/34 of the

Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that when the dead body

of an unknown man was found by the Chowkidar the

present case was instituted against unknown person.

During investigation it transpired that the petitioner was

the agent who used to book the said vehicle and it was

suspected that the petitioner was involved in the present

case.

Considering that there is no cogent material

against the petitioner and he has no criminal antecedent,

let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with

two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety

as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Supaul in connection with Supaul P.S. Case

No. 360 of 2009 subject to the following conditions:- (i)

That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to
2

how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also

undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in

the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall

clearly state that the petitioner is not an accused in any

other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii)

That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will

inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated

in any other case of similar nature after his release in the

present case and thereafter the court below will be at

liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on

the ground of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will give an

undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the

given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if

he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in

any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for

reasons of misuse. (v) That the petitioner will be well

represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two

consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-