IN THE HIGH COURT OF K'qRNATé§KA'.L'% '
CIRCUIT BENCH Afi'fiHAR¥§iA § A
DATED THIS THE 27TH DA?o§5AUGUs*?,%%,2oCs«[Xi1A
BEFQRE
THE HONBLE Msmusfiém "mam NIALIMATH
WRIT PE'r:'r1o1~§% N9; IS»-DIS}
BETWEEN: 5' ' " V
Parasappa,%5$;r'0:?€i3ap:>a f€aVél;"%%V»
Aged abo1.1i,3.3. _,' R/'0? Ugérgoi,
Saundaizti
Belgaum _DistI*i;:t,_v __ - I . . . . PETFFIONER
"[BSz'SIéI;1«\?I1=§L1i,'I':¥<Ai'{V;.JUN CBASAREDDY,
- ,ADV'OCATE.(ABSENT.)]
V A. ..... .. V
1*. me 'Cdn¥imis*$ioner,
._ "I{a1iia:t_aka:;'1?EcIigious Institutions
' And Chazitable Endowments,
Chmxgarajpet, Bangalore» 18.
. .. -' 1' The Ffiiecutive Ofiicer,
" . S"1:lRen11kadev1 Yellamma.
A' "fjvevasthana Trust, Yellammana Gudda,
Saundatti Taiuk, I Marg,
" JE3elgaum--591 I26. . . . . RESPONDENTS
(BY SR1. R. L.PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2. {AI3SEN’}’.)
SRI.R.K.HATTI, GP. FOR R1.)
VA”
This Writ petition is filed under
227 of the Constitution ef Ind_i,-evprayiag tG–Idiree_1;;. the ‘
respondents to sanction the susta.inanee.iai1e’Wa11ee fora
period of 14 years for maintainailce:fofipetitiexaexg
family and etc.
This petition coming on ‘ ‘d:.ay,:Vgthe Court
made the following: A
ab sent:
Viaave been appointed as a
t1:ie’:’.’Seet5i3.t.1’i’i’ie:s.po11dez1t on 1.1 1. 1977 and was
suspendetiitxxi View of the oztiers of suspension
V. A_ beiiié. peesed, Z “he……._e1ade an application for grant of
‘s1istai1::afiee éilowance and the same having not been
uleas filed the present petition.
«:”I’I:1e petitiorier was suspended on 3.6.1991. The
Government Advocate appearing for respondent No. I
” stibmits that subsequently the petitioner has been
terminated {mm his services on 13.6.2005. There has been a
substantial delay in making the iepresentatien for grant of
sustainaeee allowance and also in View of the fact that the
:gQ@[\»-~
wag;
petitioner has been terminated fiom the __ :_.v.;’_>’::_
13.6.2005, this petition does not suxvive for~c::.4x:1i§.;i;L1Veir§i:iQ1;.VL: ” = ..
4. In View of the above mentioned ;’acts;” *J:ic:”‘pr’a§rer
sought far by the petitioner 1i}iSCO”I1{‘3£3V’iV’f’.f(Zi be: *
granted by this Court. Aoco1§ji4::i22gfly’;.V_the “petition being
devoid of merits is .
Office to send a o’1.iit;Vr’~ihe petitioner and
mspon,dc:},:1t_ V ‘ ‘ ‘
Sd/-r
Judge
3