IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.20380 of 2010
PARBATI DEVI WIFE OF METHO SAH
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
----
2. 16.6.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case
instituted for the offence under sections 304B, 498A, 120B and
201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition
Act.
Considering that the petitioner is the mother-in-law of
the deceased as also the submission that she was separate in
mess, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of her
surrender within four weeks from today in connection with
Nayagaon P.S.case No.32 of 2009 shall be released on
anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (five
thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai, subject
to the conditions as laid down u/s.438(2) Cr.P.C. and (i) that
one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who
will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related
with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish
information to the court about any change in the address of the
petitioner, (ii) that the petitioner shall undertake to be
represented on the first date after cognizance and in case she
fails to do so, her bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled, (iii)
that the petitioner will give an undertaking that she will receive
-2-
the police papers on the given date and be present on the date
fixed for charge and if she fails to do so on two given dates and
delays the trial in any manner, her bail will be liable to be
cancelled for reasons of misuse and (iv) that the petitioner will
be well represented on each date and if she fails to do so on
two consecutive dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled.
Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J. )
Leave a Reply