High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Parikshan Sahni vs The State Of Bihar on 21 April, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Parikshan Sahni vs The State Of Bihar on 21 April, 2011
                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                            Cr.Misc. No.9441 of 2011
                   PARIKSHAN SAHNI S/O LATE TUNTUN SAHNI, R/O
                   VILLAGE-KHARIK SHIVGANJ TOLA WARD NO. 1, P.S.-
                   NAUGACHHIA (KHARIK), DISTRICT-BHAGALPUR.
                                                       .........Accused-Petitioner
                                            Versus
                   THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                                       ............Opposite Party.
                                           -----------

03 21.04.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner being the co-villager of the

informant is apprehending his arrest in a case registered

under Sections 341, 323, 354 and 379 of the Indian Penal

Code.

The accusation is of making assault and taking

away gold chain and cash of Rs. 800/-. The charge-sheet

has been submitted in December, 2007 under Section

379 of the Indian Penal Code, which is only non-bailable

offence alleged.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

petitioner that petitioner is residing in Banglore and he

was not aware of the alleged offence. It is further

submitted that there is no criminal history against the

petitioner.

Let the learned court below consider the regular
2

bail application of the petitioner keeping in view that the

cognizance has been taken in the year 2007 under

Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code for the accusation

of making assault and taking away gold chain and cash

of Rs. 800/- and if possible dispose off the regular bail

application preferably on the same day if the petitioner

surrenders and prays for regular bail within a period of

four weeks from today in connection with Naugachhia

(Kharik) P.S. Case No. 345 of 2006 pending in the Court

o the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Naugachhia,

with an undertaking that the petitioner will regularly

appear during trial.

This court has not interfered only on the ground

that the case was instituted in the year 2006.

This application is disposed off with the

aforesaid observation.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.)
Nitesh/Safik