Parivartankari Prarmbhik Shiks vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 14 September, 2010

                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                            CWJC No.1552 of 2008
               Parivartankari Prarmbhik Shikshak Sangh, Bihar
               Pradesh Office at Shivpuri, Damuchak, Muzaffarpur
               represented through its President Sri Bansidhar
               Brajwashi son of Sri Nand Kishore Sahni, resident
               of village and P.O. Raksa, P.S. Karja, District-
               Muzaffarpur                       ............ Petitioner
                               Versus
             1.The State Of Bihar
             2.The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of
               Human Resources Development, Bihar, Patna
             3.The Secretary, Department of Primary and Adult
               Education, Bihar, Patna
             4.Director State Council of Education, Research and
               Training, Patna
             5.The District Magistrate-cum-Chairman, Bihar
               Education Project, Patna
             6.The District Superintendent of Education, Nalanda
             7.The District Superintendent of Education-cum-
               District Programme Coordinator Bihar Education
               Project, Vaishali
             8.The District Superintendent of Education,
               Muzaffarpur
             9.Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Narayanpur,
               Ekangarsarai, District- Nalanda
             10.The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj, Kermadih Tola
               Ghusukpur Anchal Kudhani, District- Muzaffarpur
                                                 ......... Respondents
                                 -----------

2. 14/09/2010 The grievance raised by the Association

is apparently in respect of some of the

members of teachers, who have not been sent

for training and whose services have been

terminated on the ground of them having

obtained below 45% marks in Intermediate.

Such grievance cannot be agitated by the

Association in collective manner. The

grievance is personalized in nature and

therefore individual teacher can only raise
2

such grievance individually.

The writ application is accordingly

dismissed.

Pradeep/                       ( J. N. Singh,J.)