High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Parmanand Thakur @ Paro Thakur vs The State Of Bihar on 23 March, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Parmanand Thakur @ Paro Thakur vs The State Of Bihar on 23 March, 2011
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                        Cr.Misc. No.8388 of 2011
           PARMANAND THAKUR @ PARO THAKUR, S/o Jagan Thakur.
                                 Versus
                          THE STATE OF BIHAR
                                -----------

02. 23.03.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offences under Section 387 of the Indian Penal Code, Section

17 of C.L.A. Act and 10, 13 and 16 of U.A.P. Act.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that

the petitioner was allegedly arrested with incriminating posters

on account of which he has been implicated in the present case

and he is accused in only one other case.

Considering the same, let the petitioner, above

named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the

satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in

connection with Piribazar P.S. Case No. 48 of 2010 subject to

the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a

close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving

genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and the

other bailor shall be the sister of the petitioner namely Parvati

Devi. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there

is any change in the address of the petitioner. (ii) That the

bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court

concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of

similar nature after his release in the present case and
2

thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the

proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii)

That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive

the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed

for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays

the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for

reasons of misuse. (iv) That the petitioner will be well

represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two

consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

In view of nature of offence, the petitioner is directed

to appear before the Superintendent of Police, Lakhisarai

within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and

every two weeks thereafter for the next nine months. The

conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in this

period by the superintendent of Police concerned and if it is

found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the

court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation

of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the

Superintendent of Police, a certificate will be filed by the

petitioner before the court concerned.

The fact that the petitioner is accused in only one

other case will be verified by the Magistrate concerned before

releasing the petitioner on bail.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-