Posted On by &filed under Gujarat High Court, High Court.


Gujarat High Court
Parmar vs State on 29 January, 2010
Author: M.R. Shah,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/735/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 735 of 2010
 

===================================


 

PARMAR
RAMJIBHAI LEGAL HEIR OFDECD. MANSINGBHAI LALABHAI & 17 -
Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 2 - Respondent(s)
 

===================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
JOY MATHEW for Petitioner(s) : 1 - 18. 
MR. NIKUNT RAVAL. AGP for
Respondent(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) : 2 -
3. 
=================================== 

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 29/01/2010 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

1. By
way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
the petitioners have prayed for an appropriate writ, direction and
order directing the respondent to regularize the possession of the
respective petitioners.

2. Shri
Joy Mathew, learned advocate for the petitioners has submitted that a
detailed representation shall be made by the respective petitioners
to the District Collector, Dahod within a period of two weeks from
today. In view of the above, present Special Civil Application is
disposed of with a direction that as and when such a representation
is made by the respective petitioners within a period of two weeks
from today, same shall be considered by the District Collector, Dahod
in accordance with law and on merits within a period of four weeks
from the date of receipt of such representation and communicate the
outcome of the same to the respective petitioners within a period of
two weeks from such a decision. However, it is observed and made
clear that this Court has not expressed anything on merits with
respect to the regularization of the occupation and possession of
the respective petitioners and it is ultimately for the District
Collector, Dahod to take an appropriate decision in accordance with
law and on merits and in light of the policy that may be prevailing
with respect to such regularization. With this, present Special Civil
Application is disposed of. Direct service is permitted.

(M.R.SHAH,J.)

kaushik

   

Top


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

8 queries in 0.941 seconds.