Parvathamma vs Smt Savithramma on 10 September, 2009

IN THE H1GI-I COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 10th DAY or? SEPTEMBER 2009
BEFORE   "

THE HONBLE Mr.JUsT1cE ARALI NAC%}\RA§3t  x '

CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1 i89' «DE? 2005"  'E. V  

BETWEEN:

Smt.Parvathamma,

W/o Basavaraju,

Aged about years, V K  *  

Residing at Gattipura~'-Village, gg . "  '

Magadi-~Taluk,     
Ramanagara District.,"""K:" *  .\":.~§'.APPELLANT

[Sri    

AND: 

Smt.SaV*i:thrarr::1_fi'2t:;:V' rt '4  V "
D / 0 Chikkat Huehaiahh
Aged about V-years, "

 v  Residing at Keriipanahalli,
E H11tr1du1'ge1=Hob1i,
 V K1i11iga1?T£_311,tk-;.
Tu::1ku:%:«D:s£;<:ct. ...RES?ONI)ENT

 Thisv:°Cr1.A is filed under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C

  prayingfito set aside the order of acquittai by dropping

V  the proceedings dated 3.5.2008 passed by the Pr1.C.J.

{~J_r.1;?n.) 8: JMFC, Kunigai in C.C.No.756/O5 at
"AIinexure--A.

This Cr1.A Coming on for orders this day, the Court
delivered the following:

,..<:-~/~'



JUDGMENT

Sri B.M.Lokesh, learned counsel for the appeiipant

submits that the present appeal which is

appeilant aggrieved by the order of the .,

accused passed by. the trial Conrt:.:.ttnder’:

Cr.P.C is not maintainable -andVtherefore”u’%’i’;é:4.,1i1ai.r

permitted to convert this appeai,:int;o petition.

His prayer is ai’ir)iwed–,p i1’hi’s–fjappeai be converted
into ‘revision petition,fi1e»d.ft1nder_Section 397 of Cr.P.C.
Accordingiy, .app–ea}= ‘stands disposed of as

beir1g§conv_erted.i_r1to Criminal. Revision Petition.

Tifisqnader be fined on 1iIKl2009 fin heafing

V. p_ afteir. itis eonve’rte_d__into criminal revision petition.

Sd/1..

Iudge