High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Parvati Kumari &Amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 28 September, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Parvati Kumari &Amp; Ors vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 28 September, 2010
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                         CWJC No 7237 of 1999
                       PARVATI KUMARI & ORS
                                Versus
                      THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
                                WITH
                         CWJC No 13136 of 2001
                       PARVATI KUMARI & ORS
                                Versus
                        STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
                                WITH
                         CWJC No 10437 of 2002
                       PARVATI KUMARI & ORS
                                Versus
                      THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
                               -----------

12 28.09.2010 Perused the order dated 11.05.2010 passed in this case.

Pursuant to notices issued and published, there does not appear to be any

application, objecting or claiming similar relief, filed.

The question that arises in this case is simple and

straightforward but the issues are vexed. Petitioner-College was

established in 1980 as an Intermediate College exclusively for women.

This was considering the fact that in rural Bihar, people were still

reluctant to let girls go for education in co-educational institutions and in

absence thereof, large majority would remain uneducated and, thus,

unempowered. In 1982, the said College got affiliation from the Bihar

State Intermediate Education Council, Patna up to Intermediate standard

in various subjects. Being exclusively Women’s Intermediate College

and there being none other in the subdivision, it had good students

enrolment. In fact, under the Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University at that

time, there were only a very few Women’s College, only a couple of them

constituent, the rest about four or five affiliated. Encouraged by the

number of students and their demand for such an institution, affiliation
2

was sought for and pursuant to Government approval, Tilka Manjhi

Bhagalpur University granted affiliation upto degree level education in

December, 1982. Considering the students and the need from time to

time, University extended the affiliation to more and more subjects with

approval of the State Government. With the extended students’ burden

and restricted admission fee, the Institution was suffering because it could

not even dream of meeting its ends financially. In 1985, State

Government sought information from all Universities with regard to 15

affiliated exclusively Women’s College for the purposes of granting them

the status of deficit grant College. This was consistent with the State

policy of empowerment of women. Even though there were

recommendations, instead of deficit grant, an annual grant of a small

amount of Rs 5 lacs annually was made to the College which was started

in 1986. Subsequently it was, in the year 1988, increased to Rs 10 lacs

per annum which were again grossly insufficient to meet the

establishment expense itself. There were repeated requests to grant the

status of deficit grant College but nothing came about it. In between, the

Government took a decision to provide free College education to women

under which substantial funds were made available to the College so that

they were not required to charge fee and other charges from girl students.

Then came the change in Governments and from 1997 onwards, the

College has faced nightmares. First, the annual recurring grant was

reduced to Rs 5 lacs which was immediately, within months, totally

withdrawn. That was followed by withdrawal of free education to

women. It is in this perspective, this writ petition has been filed. It is,
3

thus, necessary for the State to disclose the following :

“What had been the policy of the
State in declaring a College or an Institution to
be deficit grant? Similarly, what was the
policy for treating a College or Institution as
grant-in-aid? What was the policy in
converting a College into a Constituent
College? Why this College, which was the only
exclusively Women’s College, left out at
different times? It must now disclose which
are the Colleges which are deficit grant
Colleges, which are Colleges which are grant-
in-aid Colleges and why and why is the present
College not entitled to either deficit grant
College or being converted into a Constituent
College? Whether State, as a matter of policy,
wants to encourage empowerment of women or
ignore the same?”

Let the Principal Secretary, Department of Higher

Education, Government of Bihar, Patna file a detailed affidavit in this

regard so as to facilitate disposal of this case. The affidavit must be filed

with clarity within two weeks.

Put up as a part heard matter on 26th of October, 2010.

M.E.H./                                          (Navaniti Prasad Singh)