High Court Karnataka High Court

Patel Cargo Services vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 8 September, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Patel Cargo Services vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 8 September, 2008
Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar
"'"""'""""" '"'-" ' '-V\-"\' V!' M-mwnlnlua rm.-.eH LUURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH Cl

1 V;v'--Ff12738.06

in THE I-HG!-i coum' or KARHATAKA 

DATED mrs THE am DAY or ssrmffixgvzpgfig;  .0  

THE !-!0N'BLE MR. Jusrxcfi. 153:2. sHjrmni:§1§AJ imman

Writ Petition No. of

fietween:



1

PATEL CARGO SERVICES  _ _ ._ _ 

= N0.63,swIJMMA_r«m.sg}ID ROAD 9 -
BAN(3m,QRE-5:50 0029 "   ' 
REEQBY£?F'SVPROPl?_IETORA._ *   PETITIONER

[By  Paftil,  ,: itst M; sf Basavareprabhus Patil
V --------  .   V '=._t5r..AsWi.a.1;es, Adv.,}

TTHE oR:VE1siTAL'mAsURANCE co LTD
HAVING ITS RE'{}ISTERED OFFICE AT
ORI'E'.N'1'VI~.~IOUSE, cross, A«25/27

T " *.ASAP''I&-L.._I ROAD

 NEW DELHM10 002

 '1'!-IE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD
 TDIVISICENAL OFFICE4,
'i"I3iFJi1\.S COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR
 P._B:;NO.27, SAJJAJI RAO ROAD
 OVMYSORE-5'?O O01

0' INSURANCE REGULATORY AND
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
III FLOOR, "PARESRAMA BHAVANAIW
BASHEER BAGH
HYDERABAD- 500004

RATHI CORPORATION

NO. 1, ANNADANAPPA LANE
IE FLOOR', 'I'.C.K. COMPLEX
AVENUE ROAD CROSS
BANGALORE-560 002



'I U!' RRKIWHIHEH NIL?" LLIUKI U?  HID" LUUKU UP' RAKIVHIHRH HID?' LUUKI UP RHKNMIHRM TEIUH \JJUKl 'JP l\l-\KlVlI-\I.Hl'\I-I i"'llI..')l'I l...\

2 '§P12738.o6

53 OM su.x FABRICS  
7, ADINARAYANA TEMPLE STREET :
ccmon PET : * « "

BANGALORE-560 053    "

[By 8111. A N xrggmgaswémy, Adv";;,"ii§rvR2V; 

Sri. Ravi V Hosamani,  x 1, for R':':1;. R'-3 (£1.  - Served] V'
THIS WRIT Pefmjiow 1.s"14~IL}ED""o1s:DE1é' ARTICLES 225 85 227
OF THE CONSTITUTIGEYOF IN£_?;--IA, PR_AYiNG TO QUASH IMPUGNED
ENDORSEMENT DATED 8;5.££Q{3§=VIDE_ ;.;q:-:,A, ISSUED BY R1 AND
2 AND !3'I'U., ' V .   __ 

THIS;~?E:1t1fI*1ON1_cQMiNG««oN'.jFo:§_V}?R'EL1MINARY HEARING '£3'
GROUP, 'IiH:.s D'g$Y:, 'PH?._ COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-

        sue

 W'Ii¥.:VV is 3a gflods carrier engaged in

. V.  _   .._the ieoijfse of its business, it appears the
  accepted certain goods in the nature of 'silk
A   tmnspertation from Chennai to Bangalore from

 .. I respondents 4 and 5.

3. It is also the case of the petifioner that the petitioner

has a general poiicy of insurance [copy at Annexure~B]

with the secend respondent.