High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Pawan Udyog Ltd. vs The State & Ors. on 19 July, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Pawan Udyog Ltd. vs The State & Ors. on 19 July, 2011
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CWJC No.1297 of 1990
                   Pawan Udyog Limited Flour Milling Division, a company
                   incorporated under the Indian Companies having its registered
                   office at 159, Ravindra Sarini, Calcutta-700 007, through its
                   Director Mahesh Kumar Bhukania, son of Shri Basudeo Bhukania,
                   resident of Barakar, West Bengal.
                                                             ......Petitioner.
                                                  Versus
                   1. The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance,
                       Government of Bihar, having its office at New Secretariat,
                       Patna.
                   2. The Industrial Development Commissioner, Government of
                       Bihar, having its office at 'Vikash Bhawan', New Secretariat,
                       Patna.
                   3. The Director of Industries, Industries Department, Government
                       of Bihar having its office at 'Vikash Bhawan', New Secretariat,
                       Patna.
                   4. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Commercial Taxes
                       Department, having its office at 'Vikash Bhawan', New
                       Secretariat, Patna.
                   5. The Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Dhanbad
                       Circle, Dhanbad.
                                                             ....... Respondents.
                                              -----------

16- 19.07.2011 Heard Mr. Tej Bahadur Roy for the petitioner.

None appeared on behalf of the respondents. The

petitioner seeks refund of the amount of sales tax

deposited under coercion in the months of October 1989 to

December 1989. Learned counsel for the petitioner

submits that this writ petition has become infructuous. It is

accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.

(S K Katriar, J.)

(Vikash Jain, J.)
S.K.Pathak/