High Court Karnataka High Court

Peddavenkatarayappa vs State Of Karnataka on 13 October, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Peddavenkatarayappa vs State Of Karnataka on 13 October, 2009
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE 

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA A’I_’__
BANGALORE ”

DATEO THIS THE 13″‘ DAY OF OCTOBER’ ‘ %

BEFORE

CRIMINAL PETITION NAO_49n2 OF”V’2;OO_9__A.

BETWEEN:

PEDDAVENKA’i’ARA${“APfiA
AGED’ ABOUT 50 »YEAR:;;f; A

S/O KANTHABOj(_ALU”,MUN’IY.PLI?I§A
G.K.HOSUR VI§;LAG~E, O A ‘

GAN}I§}U§i§E7£’E c;«.1;,ra._1\2i PANOHALYATH

ASIDLAi3AT*i*éé I
‘CHiKKABA1,LAPUR DIST

G.NI.,VENXA’TVESH’_.»A» %

_L _.AGE}3 ABOUT27 ‘YEARS
» S20 KANTHABOYALU MUNIYAPPA

G;K;HOsUR VILLAGE
OAN1.IG:JNTE GRAM PANCHAYATH

O ‘SID,LAfGATTA TALUK

C}f1I§{K5ABALLAPUR DIST PETITIONBRS

(By Erin L ?RE1\/IAKUMAR, ADV)

SEW

AND :

STATE OF KARNATAKA

REP BY DIBBARAHALLI POLICE….RES1?Q’4f.i§fi_f§1.%l’S.’

(By STE HONNAPPA, HCGP)

THIS CRLP FILED O/:§.%i3i8″(:iR.E;ci[fRE)z’7THE

ADVOCATE FOR THE RETIT1ONEiRs” PR,AYING

THIS I-1ON’BLE COURT MAYEBE PLEASEDTE). ENLARGE A ,
THE RETITIONERS ON BAILEN THE, EVVENT’~.1O}?'”1’HEIR”

ARREST EN C.C.NO.292/200-8(CRIME’« .NO.63)€2008 OF
DIBBURAHALLI POLICE STATION”; PURSUANT TO THE
NON BAILABLE WARRANT IVSS{3’£«;{)”BY THE LEARNED
MAGISTRATE, SHIDLAOATTA, OFFENCE
P/U/Ss 324,307 R/W SIfZC’T£()N 3410?’ I_PC’.”.7

Petii:ti_O;:1…cO-misiigiOnflfer Orders this day, the
Court madeThe_’fO1iOw.ing’;e~éfs ‘_ *
Tizis” petitiO’nAfAis under Section 438 Of Cr.P.C.

see’Ef.ing_fOr ‘Of anficipatory bail in connection with Crime

Of’«.Dibburaha1i poiice pursuant t0 the nOn–bai1ab1e

the learned Magistrate, Shidiagatta.

.. z2’;;I-Ieard.

M

3. Earlier a case has been registered agairistu. the

petitioners for the offence punishable under Sectic;ri”3«24~

but however, subsequently Section of IPQ. iéilisoyybeends

added. The petitioners under the appreiierision ofi’atrest«..W’rsen

moved for anticipatory baiI’ithe….sarne’~has. Its’

appears after issuance. of sat:-mrrions.._ petit’i’oners_¢§ have not
appeared before the Cou1tsa’ncie.a:;’; such;ia,non~bailab1e warrant

has been issued -aygainstizithenfifiencegjdtheyiare before this Court.

As perith’e~.vv0undcertificate it is seen that the injured

has sustained asvrnany, as.-8 injuries out of which, four injuries

atcvégrie-votis in nat’ure.” In the circumstances, it is not a fit case

‘iforiiednticipatory bail. However, the petitioners may

surrender and’ move for regular bail.

W,

Bkp.

5. Accardingiy, petition is disposed of.

j
}mD3E% %