High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Pinki Kumari @ Lakshmi Kumari & … vs The State Of Bihar on 27 July, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Pinki Kumari @ Lakshmi Kumari & … vs The State Of Bihar on 27 July, 2011
                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Cr.Misc. No.22659 of 2011
                 1. Pinki Kumari @ Lakshmi Kumari daughter of Ajay Kumar
                          2. Radha Kumari daughter of Ajay Kumar
                                               Versus
                                       The State Of Bihar
                                             -----------

2. 27.7.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners

and the State.

The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted

for the offence under Sections 379 and 411 of the

Indian Penal Code.

Considering that the petitioners are in custody

since 10.3.2011 and have fair antecedents, let the

petitioners above named, be released on bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with

two sureties of the like amount each or any other

surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the

satisfaction of learned Railway Judicial Magistrate,

Sonepur, Saran in connection with Sonepur (Hajipur)

Rail P.S. case No.16 of 2011, subject to the conditions

(i) That one of the bailor shall be local since the

belongs to District Saran and the other bailor will be a

close relative of the petitioners who will give an

affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with

the petitioners. The bailor will undertake to furnish

information to the Court about any change in address

of the petitioners. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly
-2-

state that the petitioners are not an accused in any

other case and if they are they shall not be released

on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit

that he will inform the court concerned if the

petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar

nature after their release in the present case and

thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate

the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of

misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will give an

undertaking that they will receive the police papers on

the given date and be present on date fixed for charge

and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delays

the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be

cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v) That the

petitioners will be well represented on each date if

they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail

will be liable to be cancelled.

Narendra/                           ( Anjana Prakash, J. )