IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.32866 of 2010
Pintu Kumar Mahto @ Pintu Kumar, son of Jawahar Mahto
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
4/- 03.12.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned P.P.
for the State.
Petitioner, Pintu Kumar Mahto @ Pintu Kumar seeks his bail in
connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 100 of 209, registered under
Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
Neither the petitioner is named in the First Information Report
nor anything has been recovered from his conscious possession. It
appears from perusal of the impugned order of learned Addl. Sessions
Judge that the prayer for bail of this petitioner was rejected only on two
grounds. Firstly, the photograph of the petitioner was identified by the
informant’s mother as well as his father and secondly, the criminal
antecedents of the petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as
submission of the parties, petitioner, namely, Pintu Kumar Mahto @
Pintu Kumar is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds
of Rs. 10,000/ with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Danapur
in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 100 of 2009.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J.)
Ashwini/-