High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Pintu Patel vs The State Of Bihar on 22 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Pintu Patel vs The State Of Bihar on 22 September, 2011
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Cr. Misc. No.31394 of 2011
                        Pintu Patel son of late Chini Singh Patel
                                         Versus
                                   The State Of Bihar
                                        -----------

2/ 22.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 345 of the Arms Act.

Considering that the petitioner is in custody since

16.03.2011 for recovery of arms and for the alleged recovery of

stolen motor cycle a separate case has been instituted, let the

petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond

of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

each or any other surety to be fixed by the court below to the

satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua, in

connection with Mohania P.S. Case No.76 of 2011, subject to the

conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the

petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he

is related with the petitioner and another bailor shall be Munna

Singh, brother of the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish

information to the court about any change in the address of the

petitioner, (ii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they

will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any

other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and

thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding

for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii) That the

petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police
2

papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and

if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any

manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse,

and (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date and

if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to

be cancelled.

In view of the antecedents of the petitioner, the

petitioner is directed to appear before the Superintendent of Police,

Bhabua, within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order

and every two weeks thereafter for the next nine months. The

conduct of the petitioner will be kept under watch in this period by

the Superintendent of Police concerned and if it is found wanting in

any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to

initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of

bail. After reporting to the Superintendent of Police, a certificate

will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned.

The Magistrate is directed to consider amalgamation of

the present case with the connected case for recovery of motorcycle

since both the cases arise out of the same occurrence.

JA/-                                            (Anjana Prakash,J.)