Posted On by &filed under High Court, Madras High Court.

Madras High Court
Ponnammal vs Kalithitha Moodelly on 14 October, 1902
Equivalent citations: (1903) 13 MLJ 143


1. The only point argued before us is that the mortgage in plaintiff’s favour was not proved by examining at least one attesting witness as provided in Section 68 of the Indian Evidence Act.

2. No objection was taken to the admissibility of the document when tendered as evidence in the lower Court. If objection had been taken, the defect, if any, would no doubt have been cured. We cannot allow the objection to be now taken after it was waived in the lower Court.

3. We dismiss this appeal with costs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

107 queries in 0.156 seconds.