Gujarat High Court High Court

Poonambhai vs State on 24 September, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Poonambhai vs State on 24 September, 2010
Author: Rajesh H.Shukla,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/10983/2010	 3/ 3	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 10983 of 2010
 

 
=======================================================


 

PRAFULL
@ PAPPY S/O
 

POONAMBHAI
DANIYABHAI GARANGE (CHHARA) - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT - Respondent(s)
 

=======================================================
Appearance : 
MR
RG CHHARA for Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR SJ SHUKLA APP for Respondent(s)
: 1, 
======================================================= 

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE RAJESH H.SHUKLA
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 24/09/2010
 

ORAL
ORDER

The
present application has been filed by the applicant-accused under
Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code for regular bail.

The
applicant-accused is charged with having committed offences
under Sections 394 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code, for which, FIR
being I-C.R.No.243/2010 has been lodged at Sardarnagar Police
Station.

Having
heard learned counsel, Mr.Chhara appearing for the applicant-accused
and learned A.P.P., Mr.Shulka for the respondent-State and having
considered the nature of offence, manner in which it is alleged to
have been committed and role attributed, the present application
deserves to be allowed.

Accordingly,
present application stands allowed. The applicant is ordered to be
released on regular bail in connection with I-C.R.No.243/2010
registered with Sardarnagar Police Station on his executing a bond
of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) with one solvent surety of
the like amount to the satisfaction of the lower Court and subject
to the conditions that he shall:

(a) not
take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty.

(b) not
to try to tamper or pressurize the prosecution witnesses or
complainant in any manner.

(c) not
act in any manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution.

(d) maintain
law and order and should cooperate the investigating officers.

(e) furnish
the address of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to
the Court at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change
his residence without prior permission of the Court.

(f) surrender
his passport, if any, to the lower Court, within a week.

(g) mark
his presence before concerned Police Station 1st day of
every calender month between 11:00 AM and 2:00 PM till filing of the
chargesheet.

If
breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the concerned
Sessions Judge will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate
action in the matter.

Bail
before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It would
be open to the trial Court concerned to give time to furnish the
solvency certificate if prayed for.

Rule
is made absolute to the aforesaid extent. Direct service permitted.

(RAJESH
H.SHUKLA, J.)

/patil

   

Top