Posted On by &filed under High Court, Kerala High Court.


Kerala High Court
Popular Carbides vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 20 December, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 36613 of 2010(B)


1. POPULAR CARBIDES, V/44, OLD INDUSTRIAL
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (COMMERCIAL AND

3. SPECIAL OFFICER, K.S.E.B.,

4. FULL BOARD OF KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY

5. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS

                For Petitioner  :SRI.J.JULIAN XAVIER

                For Respondent  :SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B

The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.T.RAVIKUMAR

 Dated :20/12/2010

 O R D E R
                           C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J.
                        ---------------------------------------
                        W.P(C)No.36613 of 2010
                       ----------------------------------------
                      Dated 20th December, 2010

                                  JUDGMENT

The petitioner, a consumer of the first respondent with

No.HTB 19/3053, is aggrieved by the calculation made as per Ext.P13

statement to the tune of Rs.34,02,568/- the petitioner has submitted

Ext.P14 representation before the fourth respondent. Admittedly, Ext.P14

representation is yet to be placed before the fourth respondent. In view

of the order I propose to pass in this writ petition, I do not think it

necessary to consider the facts and contentions any more. As noticed

hereinbefore, Ext.P14 has been preferred by the petitioner raising

grievances against Ext.P13 statement. Therefore, it is a matter to be

looked into by the fourth respondent. In the circumstances, this writ

petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to place

Ext.P14 representation before the fourth respondent for its consideration.

This shall be done within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of

a copy of this judgment. On receipt of Ext.P14 representation the fourth

respondent shall consider the same in accordance with law within a

further period of three months from the date of receipt of Ext.P14. It will

WP(C).No.36613/2010 2

be open to the petitioner to supplement Ext.P14 representation in case

the petitioner is desirous to do so within a period of one month from

today.

Sd/-

C.T.RAVIKUMAR
Judge

TKS

// True copy //

P.S. to Judge


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

66 queries in 0.103 seconds.