High Court Kerala High Court

Prabhakara vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 10 November, 2009

Kerala High Court
Prabhakara vs The Sub Inspector Of Police on 10 November, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 5545 of 2009()


1. PRABHAKARA, S/O. RAMACHANDRA,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. HAREESHA, S/O. PRABHAKARA, AGED 20

                        Vs



1. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SMT.C.G.PREETHA

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :10/11/2009

 O R D E R
                       K.T.SANKARAN, J.
                 ---------------------------------------------
                        B.A.No.5545 of 2009
                 ---------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 10th day of November, 2009


                              ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section

438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioners are

accused Nos.1 and 2 in Crime No.641 of 2009 of Kasaragod

Police Station.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under

Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 427 and 452 read with Section

149 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. When the Bail Application came up for hearing on 9th

October 2009, the following order was passed:

“After having heard the learned counsel

for the petitioners and the learned Public

Prosecutor, I am of the view that before disposing

of the Bail Application, an opportunity should be

given to the petitioners to appear before the

investigating officer. Accordingly, there will be a

direction to the petitioners to appear before the

investigating officer on 19th and 20th October,

2009 at 9 A.M.

Post on 26.10.2009.

BA No.5545/2009 2

It is submitted by the learned Public

Prosecutor that the petitioners will not be

arrested until further orders in connection with

Crime No.641 of 2009 of Kasaragod Police

Station.”

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners and the

learned Public Prosecutor submitted that the petitioners have

complied with the direction in the order dated 9th October 2009.

5. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am

of the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the

petitioners.

There will be a direction that in the event of the arrest of

the petitioners, the officer in charge of the police station shall

release them on bail on their executing bond for Rs.15,000/-

each with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the

satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to the following

conditions:

a) The petitioners shall report before the investigating officer
between 9 A.M. and 11 A.M. on alternate Mondays, till
the final report is filed or until further orders;

b) The petitioners shall appear before the investigating officer
for interrogation as and when required;

BA No.5545/2009 3

c) The petitioners shall not try to influence the prosecution
witnesses or tamper with the evidence;

d) The petitioners shall not commit any offence or indulge in
any prejudicial activity while on bail;

e) In case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above,
the bail shall be liable to be cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

above.

K.T.SANKARAN,
JUDGE
csl