High Court Kerala High Court

Pradeep Kumar vs Dr.P.C. Kesavankutty Nair on 14 July, 2008

Kerala High Court
Pradeep Kumar vs Dr.P.C. Kesavankutty Nair on 14 July, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 509 of 2005()


1. PRADEEP KUMAR, S/O. K. PEETHAMBARAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. DR.P.C. KESAVANKUTTY NAIR, ASSOCIATE
                       ...       Respondent

2. DR. RANI NAIR, T.C.1/1710,

3. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.C.S.MANU

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :14/07/2008

 O R D E R
                     M.N. KRISHNAN, J.
              = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                M.A.C.A. NO. 509 OF 2005
            = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
        Dated this the 14th day of July, 2008.

                      J U D G M E N T

This appeal is preferred against the award of the Motor

Accidents Claims Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram in O.P.(MV)

198/01. The claimant alleged to be a businessman aged 24

years sustained injuries in a road accident. He was awarded

a compensation of Rs.67,470/- by the Tribunal. Dissatisfied

with the award the claimant has come up in appeal. It is

seen that the petitioner had sustained fracture on both bones

of the right leg with displacement. It is further seen that

immediately he was admitted in the Medical College Hospital,

where he was given some conservative treatment.

Thereafter he was readmitted in the hospital where he

underwent treatment till 9.12.87. It was further shown that

again he had undergone a major surgery on 18.2.88 and was

advised to take rest for about six months. Again he was

readmitted for removal of the plasters and screws. Even

after 10 years in 1999 he has again operated for removal of

M.A.C.A. 509 OF 2005
-:2:-

pus from the injury site. He had sustained and continued

treatment till 30.6.99. The Doctor who treated him gave the

disability certificate fixing the disability at 16% and he had

been examined to prove the same. Being a case of 1987 the

Tribunal took the income at Rs.1,000/- and calculated the

compensation. Considering the fact that the accident had

taken place in the year 1987, the Tribunal has awarded a

reasonable amount under majority of heads except under

one head namely, disability where the Tribunal reduced the

income to Rs.500/- and calculated the compensation. It was

an error committed by the Tribunal and when it is taken at

Rs.1,000/- per month the annual loss would come to

Rs.1,920/- which when multiplied with appropriate multiplier

of 17 would come to Rs.32,640/-. The Tribunal has only

awarded Rs.16,320/- and further an amount of Rs.5,000/-

towards loss of amenities and enjoyment in life. If the

compensation is granted for the permanent disability

accepting the percentage of disability as such, only a nominal

amount can be awarded under the head of loss of amenities.

M.A.C.A. 509 OF 2005
-:3:-

Therefore, I award an additional compensation of

Rs.16,320/-. Accordingly, the MACA is disposed of awarding

an additional compensation of Rs.16,320/- with 7% interest

on the said sum from 23.8.90 till realisation and the 3rd

respondent, insurance company is directed to deposit the

same within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt of

a copy of the judgment.

M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.

ul/-