Posted On by &filed under Allahabad High Court, High Court.


Allahabad High Court
Pradeep Kumar vs State Of U.P. & Others on 29 January, 2010
Court No. - 38

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4504 of 2010

Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar
Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others
Petitioner Counsel :- R.K. Kaushik
Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,Anuj Kumar

Hon'ble Amreshwar Pratap Sahi,J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel.

The petitioner contends that the respondent No.6 is much lower in merit
than the petitioner but he has been selected and appointed which is
against the relevant guidelines framed in this regard. Learned counsel
contends that the petitioner is at serial No.4 whereas the said
respondent is at serial No.7.

Let the claim of the petitioner be examined by the respondent No.2, who
shall proceed to consider the claim of the petitioner and pass an
appropriate order after putting the respondent No.6 to notice and calling
for comments from the appropriate authority within a period of 6 weeks
from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before him.

With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of.

Order Date :- 29.1.2010
Irshad


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

93 queries in 0.183 seconds.