High Court Kerala High Court

Pradeep.T.K. vs Sivaraman on 13 June, 2008

Kerala High Court
Pradeep.T.K. vs Sivaraman on 13 June, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 1929 of 2005()


1. PRADEEP.T.K., S/O.T.P.KRISHNAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SIVARAMAN, S/O.KUNJEERAN,
                       ...       Respondent

2. T.P.KRISHNAN, S/O.PAZHANU,

3. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.RAGHAVAN

                For Respondent  :SRI.JOHN JOSEPH VETTIKAD

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :13/06/2008

 O R D E R
                          M.N.KRISHNAN, J.
                          --------------------------
                     M.A.C.A. No. 1929 OF 2005
                            ---------------------
                Dated this the 13th day of June, 2008

                              JUDGMENT

This appeal is preferred against the award passed by the Motor

Accident Claims Tribunal, Palakkad, in OP(MV) 912/97. The

appellant aged 23 years, an agriculturist by profession had sustained

injuries in a road accident. A perusal of the award itself would show

that he had a lacerated wound on the ankle and a closed displaced

fracture of the middle one third of tibia plus deformity on the left leg.

He was treated as an inpatient for 5 days. The Tribunal awarded him

Rs.750/- for loss of earnings.

2. When a person has suffered a displaced fracture of the tibia

and other injuries on the leg, it is certain that he would not have been

able to do the work for atleast two months. Fixing the income at

Rs.1,500/- per month, I award an additional amount of Rs.2,250/- as

loss of earning. He was a native of kanjikulam and he was treated in

olavakode hospital. Certainly, he would have visited the hospital on

many occasions and therefore, I enhance the compensation for

transport expenses by Rs. 250/-. The Tribunal has awarded only

Rs.4,000/- as compensation for pain and suffering. It appears to be

MACA No.1929/05 2

totally inadequate considering the nature of injuries sustained by the

appellant. I enhance it by Rs.3,000/-. The Tribunal has not awarded

any compensation for loss of amenities and permanent disability. On

account of the fracture mentioned above, it is certain that there would

be temporary disability, loss of amenities and enjoyment in life for

some point of time. I award Rs.3,000/- under that head. The

appellant will be entitled to an additional compensation of Rs.8,500/-.

In the result, the MACA is partly allowed and the claimant is

awarded an additional compensation of Rs.8,500/- with 7% interest

on the said sum from the date of petition till realisation. The

Insurance company is directed to deposit the amount within 60 days

from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

M.N.KRISHNAN, JUDGE
vps

MACA No.1929/05 3