Gujarat High Court High Court

Prafulbhai vs Secretary on 6 April, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Prafulbhai vs Secretary on 6 April, 2010
Author: Ks Jhaveri,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/4064/2010	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 4064 of 2010
 

 
 
=========================================================


 

PRAFULBHAI
VALLABHBHAI PANSURIYA - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

SECRETARY
& 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance : 
MR
JIGAR G GADHAVI for Petitioner(s) : 1, 
MR HARSHADRAY A DAVE for
Respondent(s) : 1 
MR NIKUNT RAVAL AGP for Respondent(s) :
2, 
========================================================= 

 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI
		
	

 

	
      Date : 06/04/2010 

 

 
ORAL
ORDER

1. By
way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following
reliefs :-

[A]
That the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus,
and/or any other writ, order or direction directing the respondent
no. 1 to accept the application form of the petitioner as an
applicant of the open category and further direct the respondent no.
1 to issue call letter for the interview holding him entitled to
appear in the interview of Assistant Engineer (Civil) Class 2
(advertisement no. 11/2008/2009).

[B]
That pending hearing and final disposal of the present writ petition,
the Honourable Court may be further pleased to direct the respondent
no. 1 not to prepare the selection list or in the alternative direct
the respondent to keep one post vacant for the petitioner if the
respondent no. 1 continue with the selection process.

[C]
……

2. Today,
when the matter was called out, the learned counsel for respondent
no. 2 has produced on record the copy of the form filled in by the
petitioner and also the advertisement published by respondent no. 1.
On perusal of the same, it appears that in the form, the petitioner
has stated that he belong to reserve category. Apart from in view of
condition no. 6(D) of the advertisement, any modification in the
application is not permissible. Therefore, in view of the
admissibility of the petitioner that he belongs to reserve category,
this petition is not entertained.

3. Consequently,
the petition is dismissed. Notice is discharged.

[K.S.

JHAVERI, J.]

/phalguni/

   

Top