High Court Kerala High Court

Prajeeshkumar vs State Of Kerala Represented By … on 11 June, 2009

Kerala High Court
Prajeeshkumar vs State Of Kerala Represented By … on 11 June, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 3055 of 2009()


1. PRAJEESHKUMAR,S/O.CHATHAN,AGED 27 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JACOB SEBASTIAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :11/06/2009

 O R D E R
                      K.T. SANKARAN, J.
                  ---------------------------
                   B.A. No.3055 of 2009
               ------------------------------------
             Dated this the 11th day of June, 2009

                           O R D E R

This is an application for anticipatory bail under section

438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is the

accused in Crime No.110/2009 of Meppayaur Police Station.

2. The offences alleged against the petitioner are

under Sections 448 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code and

Section 30 of the Explosive Substances Act.

3. The First Information statement given by

Ajayakumar shows that at about 3 a.m on 24/05/2009, he

woke up hearing a noise and found a bomb in the courtyard. It

is also stated one bomb had exploded. It is also stated in the

F.I. statement that nephew (petitioner) and brother of the

defacto complainant had certain financial dealings and that the

petitioner had threatened the defacto complainant. Therefore,

the defacto complainant suspects the petitioner in respect of

commission of the offence. There is no specific allegation

against the petitioner in the F.I. Statement that he has

B.A. No.3055/2009
2

committed the offence. The investigation is progressing. The

petitioner apprehends arrest.

4. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the

case, the nature of the offence and other circumstances, I am of

the view that anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner.

There will be a direction that in the event of the arrest of the

petitioner, the officer in charge of the police station shall release

him on bail for a period of one month on his executing bond for

Rs.25,000/- with two solvent sureties for the like amount to the

satisfaction of the officer concerned, subject to the following

conditions:

A) The petitioner shall report before the
investigating officer between 9 A.M and 11 A.M.
on all Mondays, till the final report is filed or until
further orders;

B) The petitioner shall appear before the
investigating officer for interrogation as and
when required;

C) The petitioner shall not try to influence the
prosecution witnesses or tamper with the
evidence.

D) The petitioner shall not commit any offence or
indulge in any prejudicial activity while on bail.

B.A. No.3055/2009
3

E) On the expiry of the period mentioned above, the
petitioner shall surrender before the Magistrate
concerned and seek regular bail.

F) In case of breach of any of the conditions
mentioned above, the bail shall be liable to be
cancelled.

The Bail Application is allowed to the extent indicated

above.

K.T. SANKARAN, JUDGE

scm