High Court Kerala High Court

Prakash.G. vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 8 January, 2008

Kerala High Court
Prakash.G. vs State Of Kerala Represented By The on 8 January, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 30341 of 2007(K)


1. PRAKASH.G., PROPRIETOR, HOTEL ARYAS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,

3. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(LA)

4. THE TRIVANDRUM DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

5. K.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.R.NARENDRAN NAIR

                For Respondent  :SRI.K.A.JALEEL, SC., TRIDA

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.PADMANABHAN NAIR

 Dated :08/01/2008

 O R D E R
                  K.PADMANABHAN NAIR,J
             =======================
              W.P. (C) Nos.30341 & 34236 of 2007
            =========================
             Dated this the 8th day of January, 2008


                            JUDGMENT

These two writ petitions are filed by the tenants, who are

doing business in a shop room, situated in the land, which is on

the side of the Vellayambalam- Sasthamangalam road in

Thiruvananthapuram. The owner of the land surrendered the

side portion of the land free of cost to the Government for

widening the road, with a prayer that an old dilapidated building

situated in the property also may be demolished. The tenants of

the building are challenging the action of the Government to

demolish the entire structure.

2. The Government Pleader on instructions submits that

this property along with some other property is owned by three

persons and the petitioner surrendered property free of cost and

in respect of the property owned by two others the Land

Acquisition Officer initiated proceedings and passed an award on

6.10.2007. The purpose is for widening of a road. Whether it is

a free surrender or acquisition under Land Acquisition Act the

W.P.(C).Nos.30341& 34326/2007

2

tenants of a building has no locus standi to challenge the

surrender. Hence, the writ petitions are not maintainable.

In the result these writ petitions are dismissed.

K.PADMANABHAN NAIR, JUDGE
dvs