Prakash Koshy Benjamin vs Intelligence Officer on 2 June, 2010

0
108
Kerala High Court
Prakash Koshy Benjamin vs Intelligence Officer on 2 June, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 17026 of 2010(C)


1. PRAKASH KOSHY BENJAMIN, PROPRIETOR,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. INTELLIGENCE OFFICER,
                       ...       Respondent

2. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER

3. THE DY.COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), KOLLAM.

4. THE DY.TAHSILDAR (R.R.)

5. THE INSPECTING ASST.COMMISSIONER,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM)

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

 Dated :02/06/2010

 O R D E R
                  P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON, J
                     --------------------------------------------
                      WP(C) NO. 17026 OF 2010
                     --------------------------------------------
               Dated this the 2nd day of June, 2010

                                 JUDGMENT

Being aggrieved of Ext.P1 order imposing penalty upon the

petitioner, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P2 appeal; which is stated as

finally heard by the appellate authority on 23.04.2010, but the final orders

are still to be passed.

2. In respect of the Ext.P7 assessment order, the petitioner has

preferred Ext.P8 appeal, along with Ext.P9 petition for stay, which are also

pending consideration before the 3rd respondent.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that, without any regard to

the pendency of the above proceedings, coercive steps being taken by the

4th and 5th respondents as borne by Exts.P4 and P11 notices issued under

the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act; which course is under challenge in this

Writ Petition.

2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the 3rd respondent

is directed to pass final orders on Ext.P2 appeal, which is stated as heard

on 23.04.2010, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month

from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Similarly, the said

respondent is also directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on

2
WP(C) No. 17026/2010

Ext.P9 I.A. for stay, within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of

this judgment. It is also made clear that till such orders are passed as

above, all further steps pursuant to Exts.P4 and P11 shall be kept in

abeyance.

The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.

P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
JUDGE
dnc

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *