Prakash vs The Deputy Commissioner (Food) on 17 March, 2008

IE THE» HIIGH CZCJURT OF KARNATAKA, 

mmm 'mm "rm: rm my me'  

1}-.:":3'.. I-IflI'1".'s3.'E..E Emx. ..IU€_:u..nC$ 1'31 3-5; }v'L%1'{u"J!§'ATH

'WRIT PE'11TIc:1mc:;.53'1z5 ¢:2F 2<1r37%kk{(}1£a--I§:é) k  %

n--.-mu-u._|anIIne-a--I-I-va -I-5: -n,-r

Q;-IEQQH:

PRAKASH. _    

A-!'."'~.-ED .1.fl..F'.=*.'I.7!*T_..."|"I'   ' *

sgon-cz.~a;:RAum,¢  Q j

  '
MANI3?f£$£.'j£§LEIK'i!%sj~.l::iISTI'RIi11'I'k.--'  PETITIOHER

F'

W  :*;%%a;!Lz.«.rgz-2.n.1~,:'.r,%kk   . .,;

 A

1"  3:aE.3aJ'r3fc:jLum3s1oNER,

iFrw*-{(3:35 ".1. anrnva 1"'-:'m'l'-'t:ITr'"'I" mrnxnvn

,|, 1 .i.fI'd.'lJ..u-|'.l.,.l'I .l..a-'.l.h'aI'.l..I.'|\..l.1u-J. . I.'Ill3I-I-'l.of.I..li-

    »
A   mmmn.  RESPONDENT8

u» n}~ur-mi n..-um

 :3" « :31-2;1.'fi vE.E%a, nun;

'E'fi1iswritpe'ti1tinninfi1:adundarArtin1ea326eaz1d
W? nf"  flafiifimfifi ('If '§.r:'n'a m'~aj.-'51-" 'm m.1.-as}-.. €..."-as
izmpugnml ordm dated 23.3.2007 passed by El vide
Anne;x1.1.m- 'D' and etc.



on for 

The authmiaafion     "A

a $1.  fir-rat-  Deputy

Cnzamrmliaaiunar,      "'c1*"' cf
amaaparsrsmizum was   racnelvad' --
by     Th: Daputy
  an enquiry as per

::m.;«..,.e-.:;,s;<,;-e.=  b..%..="" p.......*=w$"I" '

£3.
E
2

:1.
E

4:
*3
in.)
«no
its
an
8
-4
E'

    'l'eval1au" "' age:-ama' t the 

   -bf Ra.3D.O00!- and directed

  deposit m;.au,oon,r- wit'h1n' 15 days and

V'   gasp-mmion was revukesd by warnizg tlua

 p;er"ciii£fi~hér,  a~~~'---  mt.-ea.  q-.=,e-e.«-.;sm~.  :11:-.-.

 .A  

 .-Pmmruiing to the petitimmer under the PDS

Cm'1tr':*.1 flnim, 1'.E1E1'.3?,., the I3_3«ge@1:_»; Eommhninner has no

J'\A"\J'\l 4-11}

juxxieadisnftion to levy penalty cf R' .3G.~..-..u,a- um.ui'ig "p'*u*'1

{L/,

 



the. p¢e'it;i12;i«::n«e.rt¢:a dc.-praait the name" A.cu:ur:urding  no

pmpen: em;u.1ir5.r has been cmtlductad. 

its ynzzggzaflrkgr  there is no  

flfimfifififiifir

.1-3' -H.'

he requmta thia murt    

 Pier    submits
2.;-;..   held that tha
   are mar-afi he
   granmd in the

__ci<m£t1g sea: by warning the petitionar,

 £3: .Ra.3fl,GODf -.

  i:u:=a.r<:'l the Earned caunaai for 

 ucxmrt is of the opium" ' n am if the chargm

  agajmt the petitioner are proved. the

n 'T  rueépgmdmzt Deputy Commissinnxsr caxmnrt levy pnnlty

A-mrludiltuilu'

1.an.l.uu1 Ian. -I-
J. UJ Ul:vl..l.l.VfiJ. 1.11!-A nuunumswmuu

 fir' :5. far

iftlm nix-harfi are notpraved,1:a revoke the suspension,

inatmfl of dmrng an the itnpumed order has beam
9/ %

\

-1, .-.. 1""... _..._r...1:4.. ..r  -'r1'-..~m«I:um

. 1.I.aJI;u.-man-.5-L~.g



     ..... 

T1’mre:fc:re thia mutt is of the that

m”mmnure~ ‘I3’ is ha ha quashed

Ejicgmiaaiaznsr, Mandya tn recmnai:1sI:;f ‘

__._.__…’l! __ ._…: ‘I

cuugnfifiuu wfih. “‘-u’-v”.

fl: the and a
crificn-ne=»::1z;1′.r.::ur~:. fin izaau<t.§:1 fr:n_ '£.':omu&§ioner to hnar

– t=!..1′.t.1t:v’1tl;’.-..; with the law.

Sd_,/-

Judge