. IN THE HIGH comm OF KARNATAKA' " ' CIRCUIT BENCH A'I4vQ'FE;",¥?A'3"""§§'35HvV'4" 1' DATED THIS THE 93% my 01? D}.é;"c:§éM'BEvR BEFORE THE HoN'BL;3 me.qL.rs%rzcE.._bI.A§iAN:;§A_5 c1=e:MmAL P1+:'1*1?rf1:>'r~:i}r§o..1i7?4;2t1o3 BE'I'WEEN:__a ~ " Pialhaddas (2-.9j':ai«:.; 3 V * S/9. Aged: years' -- . 09¢: Prizgxictbr of'M,*.s} inciusuies Mangal Udyog Nagaig. inflate. Petitioner noticé issgiéti to pctitioner and service held sufiicient) '.€'m'az1d'=., "~ I s/.6. L&3ci:1an.AE1'$gt1ndi 1>:.~o'jp:-ism 5: M] s. Lax.-ami Venkatesh Agm F<;}o<;1s:,,":C)moe at Flat No.23, Rajcnfifa Nagar, Gokui Road, Hubli. ...1-"kspondent AA ' Tiéis petition is filed under section 482 (3r.P.C., praying 'V'..Ato.._qju;a:sh the impugneci ordsr dated 30.11.2007, passad by the I Addl. Bistrict 6:. Sessions Judge at Dhaxwad, sitting at _,__I-Tiubli, in Cr1.R.F'.No.198/2907, oonfixming the oréer ciated 19,09,200?/22.09.2907, passed by the JMFC Ii Court at Hubli in (3.C.No.1378/2004 85 ate. This petition coming an for admission this day, the Court: made the foiiowing: ORDER
There is no representation for petitioner.—-. V
2. The petitioner is T 3 as, T Aa¢cus.–5e__
C.C.No.1378/2004, pending fez: ofienee
under section 138 of the Negonaleie .§nste{‘i1znents eat, 1881
(for short, ‘the Act’). I T 3 A 2
3. The trial of PW1 and
the evidence ixifétei After the
examinafionTAof..aceiieed« section 313 Cr.P.C., accused
was ea12ed_ defence. Thereafter, accused
filed appiit:-etjon”un£ier..’section 31 1 Cr. P. (1., along with list
‘ V’ {:vi£neS3Ieeé…n§3n 1§§{)H§.2OG7, applieafion filed under section
T en payment of cost of Rs.500/ – and
to lead defence evidence. The accused
absent on 20.03.2007. Therefore, nonfbaiiable
was issued. Against issuance of order of non-
” warrant, petitioner had pneferned
CrI.R.P.No.S9/2607′. The learned sessions Judge accepted
the revision getition and set aside the order of issuanee of
nombailable warrant against petitioner and
petitioner to appear befom triai Cortrtxm .
4. On. 12.04.2007, the pe§ifiofier_remajn.eri
learned trial Judge issued against
petitioner. The A’ in
Cr1.R.P.NO.198/2007. rig; Judge has
dismissed is before
this Court 2:3,? <3.
It_ ii; of order sheet, pctitimer
has remzrizreé %abse1A1t: explanation was given for
his almeoce. V$v1’A1e”Ltances, the trial Court in order to
socizre. the éeeused was const1a1z1ed’ to issue non~bailsb}c
accused. Therfiore, no fault oouksl be
of trial Court as also order passed by
Court.
Therefore, petition is dismissed at themstage of
T «. ” “admission.
Sd/-,_§_
I udge
SNN