IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CWJC No.5312 of 2011
PRAMOD KUMAR SINHA .
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS .
-----------
02. 11.04.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and for
the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits
that the writ application has now become infructuous, but
urges that at least the authority should be directed in
future to decide any such application well in time and not
to render it infructuous by delayed action, in view of the
statements made in the counter affidavit.
There is no occasion for this Court to make any
pious observations at this stage. But if the respondents are
of the opinion that matters were unduly delayed in
decision making, it is expected that they shall keep it in
mind in future.
The application is disposed as infructuous.
P.K ( Navin Sinha, J.)