Posted On by &filed under High Court, Kerala High Court.


Kerala High Court
Prasanth @ Kuttai vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 17 December, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 8043 of 2010()


1. PRASANTH @ KUTTAI,AGED 28 YEARS
                      ...  Petitioner
2. SAREESH, AGED 31 YEARS
3. ANOOP, AGED 24 YEARS
4. SUMESH, AGED 19 YEARS
5. PRASHOB, AGED 24 YEARS

                        Vs



1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE
                       ...       Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA

                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.K.PAVITHRAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :17/12/2010

 O R D E R
                         V. RAMKUMAR, J.
         --------------------------------------------------------
              Bail Application No.8043 of 2010
        ----------------------------------------------------------
        Dated this the 17th day of December, 2010

                                ORDER

The petitioners, who are accused Nos.1, 3, 5, 6 & 7in

Crime No.618 of 2010 of Chengamanad Police Station for

offences punishable under Section 399 I.P.C. and Section 27

of Arms Act, seek their enlargement on bail. The occurrence

took place on 31/10/2010. The petitioners were arrested on

31/10/2010.

2. The learned public prosecutor opposed the

application contending inter alia that the petitioner and

others are habitual offenders involved in several crimes. A

sword, 4 iron pipes, a packet of chilly powder and 6 monkey

caps to be used as masks were seized from them.

3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences,

nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners, the

relative conduct of the parties, the propensities of the

petitioners and the other facts and circumstances of the case,

I am of the view that if the petitioners are released on bail,

B.A.No.8043/2010
2

they will definitely influence and intimidate the prosecution

witnesses. There is also the likelihood of the petitioners

making themselves scarce and fleeing from justice. I am,

therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners at this

stage.

This petition is accordingly dismissed.

V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE
skj


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

66 queries in 0.104 seconds.