High Court Karnataka High Court

Prashanth Shetty vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 May, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Prashanth Shetty vs The State Of Karnataka on 31 May, 2008
Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh


_–_r—.. sun

…1…………… …..m \..uu:\AI_.u_r mmmnm 1-ma’!-i COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH cousrr or KARNATAKA HIGH coum

Efi ?§E E133 CQUR? SF KRRfifiTEKA RT EANE&$QRE

a?s§ THEE THE 32*” may $3 MAY,.?%Q§*fy v

BEFGRE

TE HEfi’EEE %R.JU3TECE:E%LQ¥fi$IV§”fiAME$H,K

CFil?~EZi=é.1£{.- P’E’}”Z’E'”.:’.’fi£-3&f§Ci:.{_i”£V8-4′}”E;::13.$._

EETfiEEfi

1 yxagwmxrw 3H3??? _H_V_V
E*§?.;’%.§3F~.;’¢;?E~IZ’a’x<";¥*:'~~..§'-'£*§'E'_'s"'§"'s' ' .
REEE Rfi3§T 23–¥§aRsi[: ,vn .

33%? Lgxwz mzvms, fiafiaagxaagaacx
;’;§w’.:EV,= $;M$.?é.’ia?1F.§%E’f’*?EE;ST «V “*
snug; » =. I . j= »’=f»x 5
1 5*, ,’.’, 1, ., ‘;;; ymwxrxomxa
i$?’§%E;K x §&?fiRfifi; &§V:” ‘

1<_?5£ s?A%E_&3'x3aAfiAxA

*w§%GU$3V§AanyxR=30LzcE
Efiéfififiafiffifi E? zrs sways 93321:

._ ?EQ$Efifl?Q§¢”.fi§$H €333? BQIBBING
‘ fifiEE&LQRE 1
J, ~ “”«~’ ~~~~~ .. RESPQQEENT

‘: {fiy”:fi3ifi mas3nnA&AN$A1AH, amgy}

?H§$’*:RL;§§j:é Fxaan v;s.43a cn.9.c 3? THE

»é3?naa?a a§sx~~?H£ PETE?§8§ER. yaavxwe vaaw THI3

%§fi’3&E €GfiETa KKY EE FLASEE TG RELEASE THE

“FE?§$EfifiER 3% FREE IE THE E?Efi? QF HES ARREST IN

$R,fiQ;l53§§5, 3? BRAEEEEEE. ?$LICE, QEUFI, WHICH

*g a:£ &a$_:?3£Ea FQE ?HE QFFEWCE PfU!S.3Q2, 39? ARE
Aml£fieE.%f¥ $E£.°é $3 I?fl. REE 355 25 ENE 3(1) 6?
g

[mi

‘ £x§fi gags Amw,

f’}”%§’£$ yswzwmri craamssaz are FQR exams ‘rt-rxs DAY,

z%%3z”cam§T Mags THE FQLL@§IwQ:

W”

COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT-O_:F KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR1

iv!

GRBER

The petitifinar baa gaught ffirfgfén§Ob§_

&nti¢ipat¢ry bail in C$flfié¢tiQfi’Wi§hfitheCC£imé.

2a?$.§..§2;’2$€.%5 as: Esr§:hma.’§s5§fi:’–_V_A. . ‘~f;’.’.’x;.’s;.””~.’VV’V”i?.}.’;1Q
afiiaagafi azffanrzas ‘”3sff3″! and
2.22::-;»z; zfw sm.3s;_ <;£CvCO:';e::*;C;;: 'and :r!'s"~2%5 and 3:12

af Ezafisima. Ema A<:'.'._'.' C

12: 'ifit 1':V3:;:f.3 patitisizurmr along
§1ZT=t.V;'iTiE*.E'."'::§'it"§¢v?§§'~.:ai3¢'i.';$VEfi! partitzipated in the

2..”.7.’i’..’§?€.§.f:’–.’f’L.’,§52′;V.%:.”.?¥.4’*,’.’1′.V =té’fV’::21;i:§:éV,: emf am Gayi Paoj arthy by

~;;¢e:_=;z:».e;rVCC”-;;.«;;:%:;Os~:§:*4.\_ \.s;,§;;’»7w–:as-2oa5 arcaand 6.15 p.m.

suf:%z*:z;f.v*.:–‘::éfi that tha cathax two accused
acquitted in the caste and thia

.’A_§ét§_,’;t’:§V.C:;i:;r:}ér wag abscanding. Sn the acquittal

rm? ifiimr athar tswsafi aiffiilfiéfi, has has came up with

_ agggsiimativn befmxe this court seeking fax:

gzazzt of antimiysatarf hail.

W