High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Pratima Devi vs The State Of Bihar on 29 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Pratima Devi vs The State Of Bihar on 29 August, 2011
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                         Criminal Miscellaneous No.25704 of 2011
                   Pratima Devi, W/o Pradeep Kumar, D/o Sukdeo Sah.
                                            Versus
                                     The State of Bihar
                                       ------------------

For the Petitioner : Dr. Amrendra Kumar-I, Adv.
For the State : Mr. C. Sen Pd. Singh, APP.

——————

02. 29.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

State.

The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a

case registered under Section 302 of the Indian Penal

Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Initially the father-in-law of the deceased filed

the case against unknown persons for the murder of his

daughter-in-law, later the father of the deceased turned

up and stated that it was case of dowry death.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is

married sister-in-law of the deceased and had no concern

with the deceased even though she was present at the

place of occurrence.

Considering the same as also that there is no

direct material against the petitioner, let the petitioner,

above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event

of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of

the order on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five

Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or
2

any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction

of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Raxaul at Mothihari

in connection with Adapur P.S. Case No. 17 of 2010

subject to the conditions as laid down under Section

438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as also subject

to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will

be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an

affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the

petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the

Court if there is any change in the address of the

petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking

that she will receive the police papers on the given date

and be present on date fixed for charge and if she fails to

do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any

manner, her bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons

of misuse. (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented

on each date and if she fails to do so on two consecutive

dates, her bail will be liable to be cancelled.

(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-