Gujarat High Court High Court

Pravin vs State on 3 August, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Pravin vs State on 3 August, 2011
Author: Anant S. Dave,
  
 Gujarat High Court Case Information System 
    
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCR.A/1946/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 1946 of 2011
 

 
=========================================================


 

PRAVIN
@ HAKLO NATVARLAL PATEL - THRO' KOKILABEN N PATEL - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 2 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
Appearance : 
MS
SHUBHA B TRIPATHI for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MRS. MANISHA L. SHAH, ADDL. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
for Respondent(s) : 1, 
None for Respondent(s) : 2 -
3. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE ANANT S. DAVE
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 03/08/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

This
application is preferred by the applicant convict challenging the
order dated 02.07.2011 of the Office of the Inspector General of
Police (Prisons) by which the applicant convict is ordered to
furnish Rs.50,000/= (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) in cash towards
surety and the like amount.

Heard
learned Advocate Ms. Subha B. Tripathi appearing for the applicant
convict, who submits that the above condition is too harsh and
onerous and runs counter to the applicant convict’s right to be
released on furlough and the same is required to be modified.

Considering
overall facts and circumstances and besides the jail record of the
applicant convict do not reveal that it is satisfactory, but at the
same time, it is not in dispute that furlough is due and therefore,
the applicant convict is ordered to be granted furlough, on
furnishing a personal bond of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand
Only), and surety of the like amount, on the usual terms and
conditions and to the satisfaction of the jail authority and on
completion of the period of furlough, the applicant shall surrender
in time before the jail authority.

In
view of the aforesaid, this application stands allowed to the above
extent. Direct Service is permitted.

Sd/-

(Anant
S. Dave, J.)

Caroline

   

Top