Gujarat High Court High Court

Pravinsinh vs State on 29 April, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Pravinsinh vs State on 29 April, 2011
Author: Ravi R.Tripathi,&Nbsp;Mr.Justice P.P.Bhatt,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CR.MA/5834/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CRIMINAL
MISC.APPLICATION No. 5834 of 2011
 

In


 

CRIMINAL
APPEAL No. 656 of 2009
 

 
=========================================================

 

PRAVINSINH
JAYENDRASINH - Applicant(s)
 

Versus
 

STATE
OF GUJARAT & 1 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
THROUGH
JAIL for
Applicant(s) : 1, 
MR KARTIK PANDYA, APP for Respondent(s) :
1, 
RULE NOT RECD BACK for Respondent(s) :
2, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

and
		
	
	 
		 
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE P.P.BHATT
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 29/04/2011 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

(Per
: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI R.TRIPATHI)

1. Rule
was issued on 27.04.2011 returnable on today, so as to enable the
learned APP so as to enable the learned APP to obtain the statement
of the accused seeking details of the post-death rituals, to be
performed after his brother-in-law (sister’s brother) died.

1.1
Learned APP places on record statement of convict recorded on
28.04.2011, wherein it is stated that the rituals of ‘phool
padhramani’ is to be performed by the accused. Besides, the
applicant has stated that his father-in-law
is paralytic and his mother-in-law has expired and the deceased has
survived by one daughter, aged 6 months.

3. Learned
APP invited attention of the Court to the jail remarks. The
applicant-convict has enjoyed one furlough (21.08.2010 to
03.09.2010). Nothing adverse is noticed from the jail remarks.

4. For
the contents of the application, the application is allowed. The
applicant-convict is ordered to be released on temporary bail for a
period of 20 days from the date of his release in Criminal Appeal
No.656 of 2009 pending before this Court, on her executing a personal
bond of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of
the Jail authorities.

5. The
applicant shall surrender to the Jail authorities on expiry of the
temporary bail period.

6. Rule is made
absolute.

(Ravi
R.Tripathi, J.)

(P.P.Bhatt,
J.)

*Shitole

   

Top