High Court Kerala High Court

Prema.K. vs The Director on 26 September, 2007

Kerala High Court
Prema.K. vs The Director on 26 September, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 28497 of 2007(P)


1. PREMA.K., W/O NALINAKSHAN,
                      ...  Petitioner
2. RADHA.K., W/O RAVEENDRAN,
3. PINNANATH SAILAJA,
4. SUMATHI K., W/O MOHANAN,
5. SUBHASHINI E.V.,

                        Vs



1. THE DIRECTOR,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DISTRICT OFFICER,

3. CONTROLLING OFFICER/PRINCIPAL,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :26/09/2007

 O R D E R
                         S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
                   -------------------------------
                  W.P.(C)No. 28497 OF 2007
                 ----------------------------------
              Dated this the 26th day of September, 2007

                            JUDGMENT

The petitioners who claim to be unemployed ladies submit

that the 3rd respondent is continuing as temporary last grade

servants beyond six months to the prejudice of the rights of the

petitioners also to be considered for such temporary employment

through the Employment Exchange. However, for the present,

the petitioner would be satisfied with a direction to the 3rd

respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 representation

filed by the 1st petitioner after affording them an opportunity of

hearing.

2. I have heard the learned Government pleader also.

The learned Government pleader submits that none of the alleged

employees, who are continuing, have been made a party to this

writ petition.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

while passing orders on Ext.P3, the 3rd respondent can hear them

also.

W.P.(c)No.28497/07 2

Having heard both sides, I dispose of this writ petition

with a direction to the 3rd respondent to consider and pass

appropriate orders on Ext.P3 representation filed by the first

petitioner after affording an opportunity of being heard to the

1st petitioner and the last grade employees, about whom the

complaint is made, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate,

within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this

judgment.

S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

Acd

W.P.(c)No.28497/07 3