High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Premchandra Jha vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 14 February, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Premchandra Jha vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 14 February, 2011
                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                        CWJC No.1152 of 2011
                                                -----------

Prem Chandra Jha, son of late Adityanath Jha, Proprietor Rajdhani
Litho Art Printing Press, resident of village , P.O. and P.S. Barahiya,
District Lakhisarai
…….. Petitioner
Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Secretary, Department of Agriculture,
Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna

2. The Project Director, “Atma” Supaul cum District Agriculture
Officer, Supaul, District Supaul.

3. The Director, Agriculture Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

4. The District Magistrate-cum-President, Atma, District Collectorate,
Supaul, District Supaul.

……. Respondents
…………

For the Petitioner : Mr. Suman Kumar Mishra, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Ram Narayan, A.C. to S.C. 23

——-

03/ 14.02.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

counsel for the respondents.

2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner

for directing the respondents to pay the due amount for the

stationary and other materials supplied by the petitioner to the

respondents against supply order issued by the Project Director,

Atma, Supaul.

3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

as well as the materials on record, this writ petition is disposed of

with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the District Magistrate,

Supaul, who is also President of Atma (respondent no.4) along

with an application giving details of his claim as well as a copy of

this order. If such an application is filed by the petitioner before

the said authority, he shall decide the same within two months

from the said date and all the admitted dues shall be paid to the
petitioner immediately thereafter. However, if any amount is

found to be not payable, the said authority shall pass a reasoned

order with respect thereto within the aforesaid period and the

petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the same before an

appropriate forum.

MPS/                          ( S. N. Hussain, J.)