High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Premlata Kumari vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 14 September, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Premlata Kumari vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 14 September, 2010
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                           CWJC No.10127 of 2009
                  PREMLATA KUMARI, W/O SRI OM PRAKASH SHARMA,
                  R/O VILLAGE-VARUNA, P.O.-KHAIRA, P.S.-
                  RAFIGANJ, DISTRICT-AURANGABAD.
                                             .....................PETITIONER.
                                  Versus
                  1. THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH SECRETARY,
                  GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA.
                  2. THE DIRECTOR, PANCHAYAT RAJ DIRECTORATE,
                  BIHAR.
                  3. THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER, AURANGABAD.
                  4. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, RAFIGANJ,
                  AURANGABAD.
                  5. MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT SIHULI, RAFIGANJ,
                  AURANGABAD.
                  6. NIRBHAY KUMAR, S/O SRI SATRUGHAN SHARMA,
                  R/O VILLAGE-VARUNA, P.O.-KHAIRA, P.S.-
                  RAFIGANJ, DISTRICT-AURANGABAD.
                  7. KAMLESH YADAV, S/O SRI SHIV RAJYA SINGH,
                  R/O VILLAGE-CHANDAUL, P.S.-RAFIGANJ,
                  DISTRICT-AURANGABAD.
                  8. NIRMALA KUMARI, W/O SRI YASHWANT RAI
                  BALWANT SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-CHANDUAL, P.S.-
                  RAFIGANJ, DISTRICT-AURANGABAD.
                  9. HEMWANTI KUMARI, W/O SRI MAHESH KUMAR
                  SINGH, VILLAGE-KHAIRA, P.S.-RAFIGANJ,
                  DISTRICT-AURANGABAD.      .....................RESPONDENTS.
                                -----------

4 14.09.2010 The grievance of the petitioner is

that on her application some enquiry was

initiated in respect of appointment of

Shiksha Mitra and the certificates of the

concerned candidates were under scrutiny.

However, the said scrutiny has not been

completed. The petitioner’s prayer is that

she ought to have been considered for

appointment by cancelling the appointment of

the persons who were not eligible.

                             From        the    counter            affidavit,        it
                              2




          appears    that    after     the     Appellate    Authority

was constituted in terms of the amended Rules

the matter has been referred to the Appellate

Authority by the Block Education Officer

himself vide his letter dated 19.10.2009, a

copy whereof is annexed as Annexure-B to the

counter affidavit.

In that view of the matter, this writ

application is disposed of with a direction

to the District Teachers Employment Appellate

Authority, Aurangabad to take up the matter,

consider the same and, after hearing the

parties, pass appropriate speaking orders in

accordance with law within the time frame fix

for disposal of such maters in the Rules.

Arvind/                           ( J. N. Singh, J.)