IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Con.Case(C).No. 1049 of 2010(S)
1. PRIYA K.S., AGED 33 YEARS,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. SRI.JOSE ABRAHAM,
... Respondent
2. SMT.SHERLY K.GEORGE,
For Petitioner :SRI.T.GOPALAKRISHNAN
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN
Dated :18/08/2010
O R D E R
P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.
-------------------------------
Cont. Case (C) No.1049 of 2010
-------------------------------
Dated this the 18th day of August, 2010
J U D G M E N T
This contempt case is filed alleging that respondents
who are the Managing Director and the Diary Manager of the
Ernakulam Regional Co-operative Milk Producers Union Ltd. have
violated Annexure-I judgment of this Court in W.P.(C) No.32724
of 2009. By the said judgment, the first relief prayed for in the
writ petition, viz., a direction to the respondents in the writ
petition to comply with the tender conditions in Ext.P1 tender
notice and to execute an agreement incorporating the terms and
conditions, was declined. The second prayer was for a direction
to the respondents to release the amount payable for the
previous year during which also the petitioner was the successful
taxi operator. As regards the said relief, learned standing
counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that any money
remaining unpaid will be paid, after the accounts are settled
expeditiously and in any event within two weeks. The petitioner
has no case that the said undertaking has not been complied
Cont.Case (C) No.1049 of 2010
2
with. The grievance put forward is that the terms and
conditions of the agreement entered into by the petitioner for
the year 2009-10 have not been complied with. In my opinion,
if the respondents are not adhering to the terms and conditions
entered into by the petitioner with the respondents, the
petitioner’s remedy lies elsewhere. In such circumstances, I find
no ground to entertain the contempt case. It is accordingly
dismissed.
P.N.RAVINDRAN,
Judge.
nj.