High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Prof.Pratibha Rani vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 7 March, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Prof.Pratibha Rani vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 7 March, 2011
              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                        CWJC No.4172 of 2011
      PROF.PRATIBHA RANI RETIRED AS PROFESSOR AND HEAD, DEPARTMENT
      OF ZOOLOGY, M.R.M. COLLEGE, WIFE OF LATE SURESH CHANDRA
      BHADANI, MOHALLAKIDWAIPURI, P.S. KOTWALI, DISTRICT6-PATNA
      UNDER LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA.
              ...                        ...   PETITIONER.
                                Versus
 1.   THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE SECRETARY HIGHER EDUCATION,
      GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA.
 2.   THE VICE CHANCELLOR, LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY,
      DARBHANGA.
 3.   THE REGISTRAR, LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA.
 4.   THE FINANCE OFFICER, LALIT NARAYAN MITHILA UNIVERSITY,
      DARBHANGA.
               ...                        ...   RESPONDENTS.
                             -----------

2. 7.3.2011. Heard Shri Ratan Kumar Kumar,

learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

petitioner, Smt. Shail Kumari Jha, learned

counsel appearing on behalf of the

respondent nos.2, 3 and 4/Lalit Narayan

Mithila University, Darbhanga and Shri

Vikas Kumar, learned A.C. to learned

Advocate General appearing on behalf of the

respondent no.1/State.

The petitioner, who retired with

effect from 31.12.2009 as Reader,

Department of Zoology from M.R.M. College,

Darbhanga, has prayed for directing the

respondents to clear his all retiral dues.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits

that petitioner may be granted liberty to

file representation before respondent no.2
2

raising his demand.

The writ petition is being disposed

of with liberty to the petitioner to file a

detailed representation before respondent

no.2 within a period of six weeks from

today. If such representation is filed,

respondent no.2 is required to examine the

same and pass appropriate order in

accordance with law redressing all the

grievances of the petitioner and also clear

all the admitted dues with admissible

interest within a period of three months

from the date of filing of such

representation. In case of refusal,

respondent no.2 is directed to pass a

speaking order within aforesaid time.

With aforesaid observation and

direction, the petition stands disposed of.

N.H./                           ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)