High Court Karnataka High Court

Prof Rajagopal H Udupi S/O Haridas … vs The Union Of India on 30 October, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Prof Rajagopal H Udupi S/O Haridas … vs The Union Of India on 30 October, 2008
Author: Ajit J Gunjal

E
2
M
§
ii.

0

’52
D
C}
U
I
9
I
E
“<"'
Z
Z
:5
in!-.

O
I-

K
:3
O
U
I
Q
‘I
E
E”:

Z
M
5
il-

3

E
D
3
J
12
2
K
5
E
I
I
I:

§
In
3
E
3 ._
1
E

rm ‘(-1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA’

CIRCUIT’ BENCH AT GULBARG;A_””..VV’:

DATED THIS THE 307*! DAY 01? ocrc!:§ER_A_-éoiis %

3EF,ORE”« A_

THE HOWBLE MR. JUS*r1%C:3%_AJrr q_._%’;;m=xJ.+§E; ‘

w.P. NO. V2;3.§99/2665. (s~.R:Esj”~~. ”

BETWEEN:

Prof. Rajagopal H. Udupi ‘
Son of Sri. Ha:-idas Acharya Udupi,” ” vv
Aged about 56 years, ” ‘ V. _ _
Formerly worlciag as Professor 2: A V
Pharmaceutical ”
Vutkoor Laxfmaiah 1’ .j ‘ ‘
College of ‘«1.;:__ VV ,
Raichur, now Wbrldngas if ‘
Professorfia Head, –_ ‘ »
Departxncnt of Pharmaceutical ‘
Chemistry, NET ‘
Raichur, and _ ” _
residing at Nc§.7’~i3-121, . _ V

~ …..

Raichurf-«S84 103.

i”E’I’ITION ER

1 .,As§A-R–NA Y. BABLAD, ADV. FOR
1 “M13; s;rBBARAo 85 00., ADVS.)

‘ ‘ “1; I ‘ ” Unitiilv India,

u A Repttsgnted by the Secretary to
Government, Ministry of
Resources Development,

State of Karnataka,

Represented by the Secmtary to
Government, Depaztmcnt of
Health Ga Family We.-lfare Services,
NLS. Building,

Bangalore — 560 001.

maintaining the writ petition is does not arise. Siicejfinther

submits that, in the absence of petitioner “any

qualification in Pharmacy the question of

AICTE pay scales does not

S. I have given my? conaiticitntton
submissions of the for the

parties.

6. Beforeitentezfinfi eontboversy between the
partae’ facts; tequired tombe noticed. The
appointitxe:ii’t:’1-I;;of_ was under Education

Regulation of the said Education Regulation

3:

S2
3:

E
E
Z
M
§
3L
(3
‘*5
O
U
E
:1:
3
‘E
2
M
§

15..

O
E
:3
O
u
z
9
:1:
2
2
M
§
H–

O
’52
:3
O
U
2
Q
:1:
§
2
Z
M
5
LL
0
I’-

D!
3_._

0.
.4
: .

Q
1:

E
E
at
2:

K
E
I.-

D
E
3
D
.3
r:

2

P’

1953 would have three members
of the t’wo_VVe’1ast§es consisting of 40 students

cf_.the shall possess Pmfessionai Degree

Phérngtacyte’a§;att’.V§h.§e’%Ve;gamainang two preferably holders of
*nfo’fe$sionai«._degmeVtA in the alternative Post Graduate in
t AA thereafter the Education Regulations was
V and new regulations were being introduced,
t3f;;a’jft%§;i;;c1é.tion Regulation 1997 is in force. it would indicate
preference wifl be given to Graduate in M.Phar1na

S (Pharmaceutical Chemistry). In the absence of M.Phar1na,

second preference will be given to the alternative post

/’

2′
5

F

/F