High Court Kerala High Court

Purushan M.S vs State Bank Of Travancore on 15 December, 2009

Kerala High Court
Purushan M.S vs State Bank Of Travancore on 15 December, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 35744 of 2009(K)


1. PURUSHAN M.S,  AGED 49 ,S/O.SANKARAN
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.K.MOIDEEN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL REHIM

 Dated :15/12/2009

 O R D E R
                  C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J.
               - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                  W.P.(C)No. 35744 of 2009
               - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
         Dated this the 15th day of December, 2009

                         J U D G M E N T

1. Challenge in this writ petition is against

proceedings initiated under the provisions of the

Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and

Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act),

consequent to default committed by the petitioner in

repayment of a housing loan availed form the respondent

Bank. The loan in question was availed in the year 2003, to

the tune of Rs.1,50,000/-. The petitioner committed default

in payment of the monthly installments and recovery from

the petitioner’s salary is being continued as evidenced from

Ext.P2. Now coercive steps for taking over possession of

the secured asset is being persued on issuing Ext.P1 notice.

2. Eventhough various grounds are raised against

the proceedings, the petitioner confines his prayer to the

extent of permitting regularization of the loan account, by

W.P.(C)No. 35744 of 2009
-2-

paying the defaulted amounts along with interest and

expenses if any liable. Learned standing counsel appearing

for respondent submitted that an amount of about

Rs.90,000/- is due towards defaulted arrears. Since the

loan account is in chronic default the respondent is not

favoring in permitting any extended period for wiping off

the liability.

3. Having considered facts and circumstances of the

case, I am of the opinion that the petitioner can be

permitted to regularize the account within a reasonable

time on payment of the defaulted amounts in installments.

4. Accordingly the petitioner is directed to make

payment of the entire amounts due pertaining to the

defaulted installments along with interest/penal interest and

expenses if any liable, in four (4) equal monthly installments

starting from 15.01.2010 and on or before the 15th day of

the succeeding months. If arrears in the loan account is

cleared payment as directed above, the respondent shall

permit the petitioner to continue payment of future

W.P.(C)No. 35744 of 2009
-3-

installments in accordance with the original schedule of

repayment.

5. It is made clear that on the event of failure to pay

any of the installments as stipulated as above, the Bank will

be free to proceed with further steps pursuant to the

notices already issued, and on any such event the petitioner

will be precluded from raising any subsequent challenge

against such proceedings either before this court or before

any other forum.

C.K. ABDUL REHIM
JUDGE

shg/