High Court Kerala High Court

Purushothaman vs The Kerala State Electricity … on 12 June, 2009

Kerala High Court
Purushothaman vs The Kerala State Electricity … on 12 June, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 37880 of 2008(H)


1. PURUSHOTHAMAN,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE CHAIRMAN,

3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM),

                For Petitioner  :SMT.P.K.RADHIKA

                For Respondent  :SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB

The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN

 Dated :12/06/2009

 O R D E R
                          P.N.RAVINDRAN, J.
                     -------------------------------------
                       W.P.(C)No.37880 of 2008
                     --------------------------------------
                         Dated 12th June, 2009

                               JUDGMENT

Heard Smt.P.K.Radhika, the learned counsel appearing for

the petitioner and Sri.Ashok M.Cheriyan, the learned Standing Counsel

appearing for the Kerala State Electricity Board.

2. The petitioner entered service in the Kerala State

Electricity Board as Junior Assistant on 3.5.1976. He was thereafter

appointed as Assistant Store Keeper on 7.2.1980 pursuant to a

notification issued by the Board inviting applications from among in-

service candidates for appointment as Assistant Store Keeper. The

scale of pay of Assistant Store Keeper was later revised to Rs.1025-

2040. After the petitioner completed 10 years of service in the

category of Assistant Store Keeper, he was given time bound higher

grade promotion in the scale of pay of Rs.1250-2540, the scale of pay

of Store Keeper Grade II with effect from 7.2.1990. While matters

stood thus, the Board and its employees entered into Ext.P1

settlement as per which, it was decided to integrate the post of

Assistant Store Keeper with the post of Senior Assistant. The post of

Senior Assistant carried the scale of pay of only Rs.1140-2340.

Ext.P1 agreement came into effect on 1.4.1990. As a result of the

WP(C).No.37880/2008 2

settlement, the scale of pay of the petitioner who was then working as

Assistant Store Keeper which post was integrated with that of Senior

Assistant stood reduced from Rs.1250-2540 to Rs.1140-2340. Some

of the persons who were similarly placed had earlier moved this Court

and by Exts.P3 and P4 judgments this Court held that they should be

integrated with a post carrying the scale of pay which they were

drawing. Claiming that benefit the petitioner moved the Kerala State

Electricity Board. In that representation he prayed that the post of

Assistant Store Keeper may be integrated with the post of Junior

Superintendent which carried the scale of pay of Rs.1360-2740. That

request was rejected by the Board in Ext.P9 letter dated 4.10.2008.

Ext.P9 is under challenge in this writ petition. The Board has in Ext.P9

taken the stand that Assistant Store Keeper is entitled only to be

integrated with Senior Assistant and that the petitioner is not entitled

for integration as Junior Superintendent. This Court has in Ext.P4

judgment to which the Board is a party held that the settlement should

not result in reduction of emoluments and that the Board should take

note of the salary drawn by the employees while giving effect to the

settlement. Though the Board filed W.A.No.587 of 1994 challenging

Ext.P4 judgment, the judgment of the learned Single Judge was

WP(C).No.37880/2008 3

upheld with the rider that persons claiming such integration should

possess the qualifications for the post.

3. In the instant case, the pleadings disclose that as on

1.4.1990 the petitioner was drawing salary in the scale of pay of

Rs.1250-2540. By Ext.P1 the post of Assistant Store Keeper was

integrated with Senior Assistant which carried the scale of pay of

Rs.1140-2340. In the light of the authoritative pronouncement of this

Court in Ext.P4 judgment and W.A.No.587 of 1994 the petitioner was

entitled to be integrated with the category of Junior Superintendent

which carried the scale of pay of Rs.1360-2740. The petitioner was

admittedly qualified to hold the post of Junior Superintendent.

Therefore, the stand taken by the respondents in Ext.P9 cannot be

sustained.

In the result, this writ petition is allowed, Ext.P9 to the

extent it denies the petitioner integration in the category of Junior

Superintendent with effect from 1.4.1990 is quashed and the

respondents are directed to issue orders integrating the petitioner in

the category of Junior Superintendent in the scale of pay of Rs.1360-

2740 with effect from 1.4.1990. Needless to say the petitioner will be

entitled to the benefit of periodical pay revisions. Necessary orders in

WP(C).No.37880/2008 4

that regard shall be issued and retirement benefits refixed and arrears

disbursed, within three months from the date on which the petitioner

produces a certified copy of this judgment before the Secretary, Kerala

State Electricity Board. If the petitioner has any other subsisting

grievance, he may move the Board seeking redressal of the same.

P.N.RAVINDRAN
Judge

TKS