High Court Karnataka High Court

Purushottam S/O Bansilal Jalu vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 September, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Purushottam S/O Bansilal Jalu vs The State Of Karnataka on 7 September, 2009
Author: Ajit J Gunjal
1.

to "i  '

WP Nos.65000 of 2009

IN THE HIGH C0iI%.:'I' OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DI-IARWAI)

DATED THIS THE 1% DAY OF' SEPTEMBER 2009
BEFORE i V i M

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJIT   i ii i

WRIT PETIT1ON No.6i500g,L2o'0gj'   4'   X
85 WRIT PETITION NOS.65OO1-6500?/2OO€3A(APMCf1'--~_ 

BETWEEN:

Purushottam, .

S/0 Bansilal Jaju,

Age: 45 years, V V
OCC: Commission Agé1'1"5,.:"A _  I .,
R/at:  Iikai,    

Tal:   

. Vineiyaiiet 8:. ii 

Represented by its Proprietor,
Ganesh,"'S/o Mahantappa Gaddi,
Aggef 4-.0 yeeiIs_, Occ: Commission
'-Ageijt, Rat APiviCYard, Ilakl,

ii 'nTg1: _vI~{uV1igund, Dt: Bagalkot.

. ay dais;
iRepre.senf.ed by its Proprietor,

Miaharitesh, S/o Gurupadappa Sajjan,
Ageizwfii) years, Occ: Commission

 " 'Agent, R/ at APMC Yard, Ilka},
'  " Tai: Hungund, Dt: Bagalkot.

. . . PETITIONERS

    Sri. S.B.Hebba11i, Advocate.)



WP l\¥os.65000 of 2009

AND:

1. The State of Karnataka,
Represented by the secretary,
Department of Co--operation,
M.S.Building, Bangalore-O1.

2. The Director of Agricultural _  
Marketing, 2115 Raj Bhavan Road,  0'
Bar1galore~»01.  2  V'

3. The Agriculture Produce
Marketing Committee', A  
I-lungund, District B'a.galkot,aj_' 1 0' f 8 
Represent by its seereiaiygiivsl   .L_';.RESPONDENTS

(By Smt. K.Vidy’arya*thi,l__HCCl~P spit?
Shri. M_ah’ante_sh.Cjioctturshettar, Adv. for R3)

These petitit->ns.iyarefiled under Articles 226 and
227 of the”Coristituvtion:_”of=”India praying to quash the
impugnedijoirder. 20.08.2008 passed by the
respondent “i*-lo.3r,Wa copy of which is produced as per
Ann’e;<ure~B in "respect of the 15' petitioner: to quash the

.iV"i1Tnp'L1_gri.é'Cl order dated 20.08.2008 passed by the
'res'p.on-d_e'nt'._No.,_3, a copy of which is produced as per
i'~:AI11'1€XiJf€'.jVC i'n_r~espect of the 2nd petitioner; to quash the

irnpugned-"ij-:or=der dated 02.09.2008 passed by the
res'p_on(;lent..ll'No.3, a copy of which is produced as per

Ar1ne:<;ure~D in respect of the 3rd petitioner.

it ii"-._T'nese petitions coming on for preliminary hearing

*'r._his.day, the Court made the following:

WP N0s.65000 of 2009

petitions also stand disposed of for the reasons" stated
therein and on the same terms and conditions. Thefiiiive is

extended til} 31.08.2010 to enable the petitiogdereLfeiijtpéit-ixiipi

the construction. If, such a co.n'strL1'ctioniv;i"siifriot

within the time specified, the oridefs-iiof
stand revived. i I A it A A L
Petitions stand
Mr. Mahanteshfls.Kot'tn'i*s'h:etta1;–,.i/_iiE§%:}1fned advocate is

granted four K.\/idyavathi,

learned Govetnmiéiiiit _p1eade1' _is"Vgranted four weeks time

u' =

to file Inemo of 5-«av

fife/"

E ‘ESEE

vw-«sf

C

Krns”‘ , i