High Court Karnataka High Court

Pushpa vs N G Manjappa on 10 September, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Pushpa vs N G Manjappa on 10 September, 2008
Author: Deepak Verma Gowda
IN THE HIGH CQLIRT 012' KARNATAKA,  A 
DATED THIS THE 10% DAY 3:311'    
pRESEN.§ %i'.'4'  _ A _  
THE HONBLE MR.  
THE HONBLE MR.   Gowm
   
BETWEZEB?  'V .&    A
1      
W]O'.LA'i'1?«';"-I,IFlC}A1§}%J %
AGE;-35 'EEARS ..  

R/AT_4.BATL1_ a:_m,::;NG
J   S.S.LA'§<;' OUT', BAVANGERE.

   

~ N S/'C3.'LA'TE LINGARAJ
 '  :--yia3ARs
 MI§¢t3R;:= REPRESENTED BY THEIR

 N_ATUfiRAL GUARDIAN MOTHER

% PLISHPA, R/QBATLI BUILDING
S-.S'.LAYOUT, BAVANGERE

  :?5K[IMARI SHRUTHI

13/ O.LA'T'E LINGARAJ

AS309 YEARS

MINOR, REPRESENTED BY THEIR
NATURAL GUARBIAN MOTHER
PUSHPA, R/0.8/ATLI BUILDING
S.SwLAYOUT, 

 



V x  R/CLSHASTRI KANA

DAVANGERE  APP';'€',LLAN'1'fiS.:.:4""._V

{By Sri: G M CZHANDRASHEKZAR & SR1   _
H.C.,ADv.}    " J 

AND:   

1 N G MANJAPPA
S/OQUDDAPPA .   
AGESO YEARS, occ. 'NEE 0:2?'  "
MAXI CAB I'£0.KA-16/546,3  '
R/F).NARASIP{F1?A  

DAVANGEIRE       V

 THE MANAGER.-~---ff ' _  t
UN:*1*E33« §N}3IA i§NSI}RAN{EB;'~--QQ.V;LTD.,
273/B;..,M§§LLH{ARJUN.§% COMPLEX,
IST FLQ.'c:sR",' 'PRAv;e.si  LR ROAD

3 MADIVALAPPA A 

113/ O.F.A.NGAPi7'A "
;f 62 YEARS' V
 R%,!o;%$HAsTRi*KANA

HEL33 BETHUR ROAD

k ' T. I:§:gV¢«.:~:T(}::RE

 % VEEQAMMA
% W[().MADIVALAPPA
"3,€}3'YEARS

  HELE BETHUR ROAD
DAVANGERE

. .. RESPONDENTS

(By Sri : K N SRINIVAS FOR R2, R.NO.1 Served. )

{By Sri : K N SRENIVAS FOR R2, R.NO.1 A u’

MFA FILED U/S 1′?’3(1) 0? MV ACT AGAIP3S.’l:'”-
JLIDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 19.9.33».-._FAS’SE§ :N w

MVC NO.832/0:2 ON ‘1″‘HE 13’1§:::”‘ C}F’fI’.HE;. PRL.VCIV1I2A
JUDGE (SRDN) Arm MACT, BAVANAGERE,”- PA1f§”1%m~’

ALLOWING THE CLAIM ‘”-_IV?E’i’i”I’1_QN». =
c:0MPENsAT:0N AND s2:E;1<:NG 01?';

CQM?EN SATEON .

This Appem coming (313 fur 01*éIe1;Sday; ‘DEEFAK
VERMA J. delivered tI’mIf’lI0szsr;i;:x§g AA ”
._II_-:DGE;MErIfr’- V _

Appefiagitftg are absent,
evm”: in “None appeared for
the learned Cimmsel
far apfiefianis; up. it appears that

Oifitfii Objéétifxis. ..’haA1i:e é..is<) net been complied despite

_____

therefore di$I11issed in defauit and for

want Qf fiésécution. Parties 2:0 bear their I'€S1)6Ci1iVC

Sd/-,1
Iudgé

Sd/§
Iudfe"