IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Bail Appl No. 1733 of 2007()
1. PUSHPALATHA, D/O. BHARATHI,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY
... Respondent
For Petitioner :SRI.T.A.UNNIKRISHNAN
For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR
Dated :22/03/2007
O R D E R
V. RAMKUMAR, J.
````````````````````````````````````````````````````
B.A. Nos.1733 and 1743 OF 2007
````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Dated this the 22nd day of March, 2007
O R D E R
The common petitioner, a lady, in these applications, who is
the common accused in C.R.Nos.91 and 29 of 2006 respectively of the
Nedumangadu Excise Range for allegedly having been found in
possession of 2 litres of illicit arrack on 16.9.06 and 8 litres of illicit
arrack on 3.5.06 respectively, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the applications.
3. Anticipatory bail cannot be granted in a case of this nature.
There is no reason why the petitioner should not surrender before the
Magistrate concerned and seek regular bail. Accordingly, if the
petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate concerned and files an
application for regular bail, within two weeks from today, the same shall
be considered and disposed of, preferably on the same date on which it
is filed, bearing in mind the decision of this court reported in Sukumari
Vs. State of Kerala [2001 (1) KLT 22].
These applications are disposed of as above.
(V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE)
aks