High Court Kerala High Court

Puthiya Nalakath Ismalukutty @ vs State Of Kerala on 22 October, 2010

Kerala High Court
Puthiya Nalakath Ismalukutty @ vs State Of Kerala on 22 October, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 32474 of 2010(H)


1. PUTHIYA NALAKATH ISMALUKUTTY @
                      ...  Petitioner
2. PUTHIYA NALAKATH BIYYUMMA,D/O.

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE BOARD OF REVENUE,

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,

4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER,TIRUR,

                For Petitioner  :SRI,C.M.MOHAMMED IQUABAL

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC

 Dated :22/10/2010

 O R D E R
                       ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
                     ================
                W.P.(C) NO. 32474 OF 2010 (H)
                =====================

           Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2010

                           J U D G M E N T

Petitioners made an application for assignment of 6 cents of

Government Puramboke land in RS No.26 and RS No.89/2 of

Neduva Amsom in Malappuram District. That application was

rejected by Ext.P3 order passed by the 3rd respondent. Against

that order, petitioners filed Ext.P5 appeal which is pending before

the 2nd respondent.

2. Meanwhile, proceedings were initiated under the

Kerala Land Conservancy Act for the eviction of the petitioners

resulting in Ext.P4 order. Against Ext.P4 order, petitioners filed

Ext.P6 revision, which is pending consideration of the 3rd

respondent. It is seeking disposal of Ext.P5 appeal and Ext.P6

revision the writ petition is filed.

3. Evidently, the proceedings under the Kerala Land

Conservancy Act are consequential to the rejection of the

petitioners’ application under the Land Assignment Act. In that

view of the matter, what is to be decided first is Ext.P5 appeal.

Therefore, I direct that the 2nd respondent, before whom Ext.P5 is

WPC No. 32474/10
:2 :

filed, shall dispose of the appeal with notice to the petitioners and

as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within 8 weeks of

production of a copy of this judgment.

4. Once the appeal is decided by the 2nd respondent as

above, the petitioners shall produce copy of the appellate order

before the 3rd respondent, who shall thereupon dispose of Ext.P6

revision at any rate within 8 weeks thereafter.

5. Petitioners shall produce a copy of this judgment along

with a copy of this writ petition before respondents 2 and 3 for

compliance.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
Rp