Puttappa vs State Of Karnataka on 14 September, 2010

 

IN THE HIGH COURT OF RARNATAKA AT BANGA.L_ORE
DATED THIS THE 14"' DAY OF SEPTEMBER;

BEFORE

THE HON'Bi_E MR. 3usT1cE"E'RA\./I 'MA:;f%i?ViATeHr1A~A 

REGULAR FIRST APPEAL Na0'i_l>:29A.S/2b"G%"~(~Q'.EC::$\.,,,4"V ~.'

BETWEEN:

Puttappa
S/o iate Séddappa _ V
Since decease _.b"=,/V_his  -- 

P.Srinivas5Re;idy"V 

S/o |ate+__Pu'i:'fVa"ppAe3;y._V  _
AgedVab0'u't--..3a57 ye:jrs,_  _
R/at ED_ommaSaVnd.ra:rvéflraggia, '
sarjapera Houfi,   '  
Ba ngaiore Srouth rarer; 

Bangalore?» V' ..,/APPELLANT

 *  _ (63,23r§--.§/.\1iAshwVan'a*t*h',' Advocate)

1. 'Sta'é;eofekarnataka
Véd Hana Soud ha,

 A. .ae_.Bar£gaiore -- 560 001

_ Represented by its Prtncipai Secretary,
 Revenue Department,
M.S,Bui1dings,
Bangalore -- 560 001.

2. The Tahsiidar
Anekal Ta|ui<,

ju/4-



to

Bangalore Rural District. ...RESPONDENTS

(By Sré Sangamesh G.PatiE, Acldl.Govt Advocate)

*>?l§<

This REA is filed 13/0 4: R 3 R/W seggtgsbrl 95-fir V'
against the judgment and decree_,dated 1-6.9".'2r0;O4"paAssed V'

in O.S.No.180/2003 on the file cef thelll Adah.Ci=.rl!._3u"gge

(Sr.Dn.), Bangaiore Rural Distridtg, B_'an'ga!ltore',_tiis'mrs.sing

the suit for decEaration and i»nj_anctio.n.'–._

This REA coming on fo'r"s'tlearing 't%2Vis"d"ay,.°vthe Court V

delivered the following}-

–…….j.–.–………………w-u on-…—_–u_.–

None appears fQ_r_”t.h_eVV_appe’E’lant§’._’jveven though the

matter was 3iall’§::.r:§’ on”-.two””OceasllcVn’s._._.fThe appeal stands

d ismissecl for ricgrfs:A;5i’Qs’eeat.ior:’

safi
Egégg

‘.5rns* ‘V l