High Court Karnataka High Court

R Deepak vs State on 28 June, 2008

Karnataka High Court
R Deepak vs State on 28 June, 2008
Author: H N Das


HIGH com? or MMMAM Him-I Agmgxr or xAmAm<A I-HGH comm or KARNATAKA mm-: comer 0? Immxmcn men count or KARNATAKA mm 0

EH THE HIGH C633'? GF' KARHETAKA AT' BARGALflEE

TI-E HOIFELE m.

mmm THIS ‘mm gm my cw?

EEEQRE j % 1 %

§E_’11VE;_E_I£

R’. DEEPAK

AGED Aaoiifma %

wfivaflorrr

A
TRM. z~z<3«:§;% 14.a:»mcc.:»mI*r GARDEN
GWDAPPA 3:!-*9iCK ~

PETITIOHE-RS

% fa': nummg Amt}

BY

fl.._..;I§ HALLI 2==.s

% mamas

' AL REPRESENTED BY

THE STATE RIELIC m'CJ$E»CUTC}R

HIGH COURI' GP' KARNATAKA
MGH CGJRT BUILDINGS

BAHGMQHE
REEERDENT

(BY SR1 : A.V. S§fl§A, HCGP)

mun uuulu ur M-wmmsnnn HIUH EU%.§K'l' Of KARNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGK COURT OF KARNATAKA H5634 Cl

THIS cm.mIAL mrmofi FILED U1 S.4~&:2.%_CR.P.C
mavme um? ms Homam omJR1*A%A:m¥ as
PLEASEQ TO QUASH Tm P*R35″,

B’I.uC)RE». mmxm cm ‘rem. ma %my

mum HfiaLI. UNIT, mam.

THIS CRCL’. mrmntzm Am’ V

mmssxon Tms BAY, THE “–.COURZ’. f

_QRDER” %}

Learned sumim that
us my new jm mm with
my discharge G1′ in
ar’g-mg.

the Iaarrwd actzauusel fin.’ tlw

ia.$n rmré.

tha petitzian k ht:-mby dispcsad efl’
‘– 12: the pawn)’ ‘ x% in approach the triai
fér discharge or to argue beafom charge ‘m flaw.

Sdfm
Judge

JH!