High Court Karnataka High Court

R Dilip S/O Late V Rajkumar @ V Kumar vs Sannarangegowda on 25 March, 2009

Karnataka High Court
R Dilip S/O Late V Rajkumar @ V Kumar vs Sannarangegowda on 25 March, 2009
Author: Lok Adalath
1

HEGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BANGALORE
BEFGRE THE LOX ADALAT

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

rump THIS Tm 25%! DAY er MARCH 2009 

(ZEONCILIATORS PRE SENT:

Koiwuz M12.JUS'I'!CE :s.1;.Pm:m% V 711    %

snxymmas 1:.   f    %'

Miacefianeeus  
Lek Adaht K13.'   .V

RBILIP, 11 YEARS,  '  j'--  3» 
$]0.LATE V.RNKUfiAR@V;-KUWKR, . 3   
Rm? N0.3?6, 15*" MAIN 5.;.V2*'5*IcRcas::,  * 
SHANTHIDAMA NILAYA,   A_ 
BANGALORE ~-- 560 $?9.._   ,  ' . '

(SIHCE THE APPELL-Arsrr._:5 fiIi£££3R_ R'.=P.*s_v' 'H13 .

FATH ER LATE v.RAixumR as v.KuMAR Bgwaz

MAC?' AFTER oIsPosAL.Vo'i:<::LAzM wrémian * '

DUE TO DEATH OF HIS FATHER, aEP.,3vfi:'s

MGTHERJNATURAL Gumow suM1"rHaA'

W]0.LA_TE v.RAn«;:UMAR an V.K§.!§&AR) .. APPELLANT

 sags. uwvens rm", ADVOCATES)

M2: 

 s.ANH:m';:J\ifiEGowDA,'MA1oR,
: '~...s,FATRER',S MAME 9:31? KNOWN To APPELIANT,
 r.::3.15:, Bsmj mvam,
 4BuhSAVESH*¢'§ARAMAGAR, MHGMORE - 79.

 _ 22. .  "?'§iaE.,:3:v1s:0§iAL MANAGER,

 'THE _0RIE§§TAL msuaancz mrra,
  Dévvzx, smnma HOUSE, %
 ._r»:'m~:;z: cmcxs, smzmone. .. aasnonmzrrrs

(BY SKI. B.S..UflES§.§, ADV. FOR. R-2)



I'-'IPA FILED UIS.1?3(1) {IF NV ACT AGMKST THE 3U{}C-WENT AND'"A.WARD
DATED 21-12005 PASSED IN MVC ROAESBSIZQGQ GM THE FILE GFV"l'}<_lE;18T"
ADDLJUDGE, HACK-4, BAfiGA1.0RE, ?ARTLY ALi.O§'VIHG THE CLAIK  'FOR
COMPEflSATI0l'%i AND SEEKIRG ENHIENCEMEPN OF COMPEWSATION. -- ' V L' f , 4 ..

was A?PEAL common FOR concxmnam BEFORE Loki'. 
BEING REFERRED VIBE ORDER amen 24-13.--2ass,»jr:}ia Fo:;Lim:1ji~aca"::2R::'Erz.V%_1:3'V» 

PASSED. 

coxcmatrmn  ' 

The learned ccunsel fer the apfieilgizt an d the  _" __  bdunsei' V

for respondent mlnsurance Cox:1pany'~a1or§g  die' repréasentative

are present.

2. After protracged is settled. The
appellant has .:fi;§:v’::?réspondent —— insurance
Company has Sum of Rs.80,000/- (Rupees
Eighty thousand ‘<i'31'1_ y'},_iii the amount awarded by flue
Trib'"§ma_}, ix; :§¢t{}};ement of the claim. A joint memo is

filed £33':-__b:=.§ha1f tlr1e.." p§a,:tiw to this effect.

r ea:po:;de1i:i€# Insuranm Company has agreed to deposit

Withiifl 6 weeks {mm the éate of preparation of

,. . j, Z ; u ' ', 'fai.}iI1g,"Awhich the said arnoum shali carry interat: at 9% pa.

% jjfiifiv-diam of default, till the date omeposit.

4. Out of the enhanced compensation, a sum cf F<'s.4_(_}x,0GO/~

shall be kept in fixed deposit in the name of the appe11ai1f'ia"*any

Nationalizad Bank for a period of 5 years. The

guardian of the appellant is entitiw to draw*"thrz; ' j x

ameunt. The balance amount shall be

appeilani.

5. This miscellaneous firs: ofin terms of
the Joint Memo. The award of stand modified

accordingly. Draw up

…. ”